Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S

Sandbar_Trekker

@ Sandbar_Trekker @lemmy.today

Posts
1
Comments
47
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Generative AI is not replacing jobs or hurting wages at all

    Jump

  • Looks like the research was only looking at Denmark:

    economists Anders Humlum and Emilie Vestergaard looked at the labor market impact of AI chatbots on 11 occupations, covering 25,000 workers and 7,000 workplaces in Denmark in 2023 and 2024.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Its probably better this way.

    Otherwise you end up with people accusing movies of using AI when they didn't.

    And then there's the question of how you decide where to draw the line for what's considered AI as well as how much of it was used to help with the end result.

    Did you use AI for storyboarding, but no diffusion tools were used in the end product?

    Did one of the writers use ChatGPT for brainstorming some ideas but nothing was copy/pasted from directly?

    Did they use a speech to text model to help create the subtitles in different languages, but then double checked all the work with translators?

    Etc.

  • What's something that's free that everyone should know about?

    Jump

  • In the U.S. they may even offer things like State Park passes.

  • Dude, what's wrong with Reddit?

    Jump

  • Given the trend of recent posts in here. I'm going to guess that the word "toxic" triggered the automod.

  • OpenAI's move to allow generating "Ghibly stlye" images isn't just a cute PR stunt. It is an expression of dominance and the will to reject and refuse democratic values. It is a display of power

    Jump

  • Too far would be anything outside of fair use. If a user generates an image of a specific copyrighted character, then attempts to make money off of that image, they could be sued.

    You can't copyright a style, but there's still a lot of legal grey area here.

    It's also worth noting that OpenAI has an indemnification clause in their Terms of Use. This means that if someone else goes after OpenAI for something that went viral and was created by a specific user, OpenAI can then turn around and bill that user for all legal fees incurred by them (whether they win or lose the case).

    If anyone is into using AI for anything, I would strongly suggest that they avoid using (or at least publishing/posting about) any of OpenAI's tools especially while all of these legal issues are still being sorted out.

  • Have you ever made up a movie after only seeing the trailer?

    Jump