I don't care that he has no rizz, I care that he continually takes credit for other people's accomplishments that he had no hand in, and when he does take an active role, the output of those people becomes actively worse.
But, I suppose you did sum that up in "insufferable jackass"
The most straightforward one is from Leviticus (one of the books that has a bunch of laws for the Israelites, including stuff like "don't wear mixed fabrics" and rules that evolved into kosher rules, along with stuff that's cited for "don't be gay" (though a lot of that comes from Paul's letters too)):
Lev 19:33-34 "When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God."
But if the House decides the election, it's not by Reps, each state makes a vote. And there are more R states than D states, so it will absolutely go to Trump.
The more jobs that are unfilled (a "tighter" job market) means that employers have to raise wages to attract employees. It's pretty common knowledge in tech that the fastest way to a raise is to switch jobs. More jobs being available is good for workers.
"Free speech" does not mean free from consequences.
I really dislike this phrasing because it does mean freedom from consequences, but only from the government, not private actors like these companies or the general public. The sentiment should really be "free speech does not mean freedom from social backlash" but I know that's not as catchy...
(Also, yes, free speech does have limits (e.g. hate speech, 'fighting words', etc).)