Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)R

RedstoneValley

@ RedstoneValley @sh.itjust.works

Posts
0
Comments
174
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • A $200 ChatGPT subscription could cost OpenAI $14,000 if you actually used it to its full potential

    Jump
  • Removed

    what is wrong with c/linuxsucks?

    Jump

  • Ragebait and trolling are fine for me, but there is imo one place where this doesn't belong: The rules section of a lemmy community

  • What subtle (or unsubtle) personality changes have you noticed in people who frequently use AI as a tool?

    Jump

  • True, but I've noticed that as a change in my personal circle, and as a recent change among people who acted different before becoming heavy AI users. I find it difficult to describe the effect, it's like a disassociation with their surroundings like what supposedly happens when people join a cult. Quite suddenly it becomes very difficult to get through to them. It's weird and scary.

  • What subtle (or unsubtle) personality changes have you noticed in people who frequently use AI as a tool?

    Jump

  • I've seen people become more introverted and unable to participate in an open discussion. They bring an opinion but refuse to reason with actual arguments. If that doesn't work out for them (it never does) they are offended and leave. Very odd behaviour.

  • Both Fedora and Ubuntu will get AI support – soon

    Jump

  • I switched from Kubuntu to CachyOS last week, after 10 years or so. CachyOS is based on Arch, and did not disappoint so far, extremely fast, makes Ubuntu look old and sluggish. It's really impressive. The basic installation was easy. The GUI package manager isn't as polished but works. A little bit of terminal tweaking was required to install some packages (VMM and KRDC gave me some trouble) but the documentation was ok. Absolutely can recommend.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • You could still be identified by a lot of factors and the combination of those. IP address, email if provided, cookies + referrer on clicked links or loaded external images, browser fingerprint, clues from actual content in comments and posts, ... It's not that hard, a whole industry lives on this kind of surveillance data collection.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Not OP, but the votes being public (not only on comments but also on posts) make it really easy for someone with malicious intent to generate a profile on your interests, political and sexual orientation, health/mental issues, addictions and so on. It's a goldmine of data that should be protected.

  • Claude-powered AI coding agent deletes entire company database in 9 seconds — backups zapped, after Cursor tool powered by Anthropic's Claude goes rogue

    Jump

  • That happens when you think you don't need experienced software devs any more, because the AI can do everything now. A seasoned developer/devOp/admin would have known that the production environment needs to have different credentials from staging and these need to be protected. If that is not possible with railway then it's simply not a good product to use and (again) a good dev/admin would have seen this in the initial evaluation phase. Not preventing AI access to the production environment from the start is the third grave mistake. However, there's none of it in the "lessons learned" section of the article. You have learned nothing and are bound to repeat your mistakes.

  • Anthropic nuked a company's access to Claude, stopping 60 employees dead in their tracks — support via Google Form is the only recourse for vague usage policy violation

    Jump

  • Good analogy. I'm gonna steal that :D

  • Anthropic nuked a company's access to Claude, stopping 60 employees dead in their tracks — support via Google Form is the only recourse for vague usage policy violation

    Jump

  • I don't doubt that it is possible to create good code when focusing on programming best practices etc. and taking the time to check the AI output thoroughly. Time however is a luxury most of the devs in those companies don't have, because they are expected to have a 10x code output. And thats why the shit hits the fan. Bad code gets reviewed under pressure, reviewers burn out or bore out and the codebase deteriorates over time.

  • Anthropic nuked a company's access to Claude, stopping 60 employees dead in their tracks — support via Google Form is the only recourse for vague usage policy violation

    Jump

  • This approach to coding is exactly what creates the problem. They will find out the hard way if they can continue to be productive when something breaks and AI is not available for whatever reason. Does anyone know how to fix it? Is the documentation sufficient to understand what the AI did?

  • Meta creating AI version of Mark Zuckerberg so staff can talk to the boss

    Jump

  • Like a digital piñata

  • 8 in 10 Europeans don’t trust US, Chinese firms with data

    Jump

  • Well... Given that the average person neither knows what data they are effectively giving US and Chinese companies, nor does anything against it, this poll is asking the wrong questions. Massive amounts of data collected for every single individual via ad-based surveillance (US) and IOT devices phoning home (China) is the reality we live in today. But the average person does not know about it and therefore can't even grasp what is done to them. They don't trust them, but they hand over the data anyway. This is basically a poll amongst cows in the slaughterhouse.

  • Polls show concerns about Trump’s mental acuity increasing

    Jump

  • I like your optimism. But I think this can go on for a looong time. I'm actually betting on it, because I tend to lose bets. A rare occasion where winning and losing both counts as a win.

  • ‘A feedback loop with no brake’: how an AI doomsday report shook US markets

    Jump

  • The scenario begins with AI agents undergoing a “jump in capability”.

    Might as well stop reading there. Another fluff piece about how useful and capable AI supposedly is, disguised as a doomsday scenario. I'm so sick of reading this bullshit. "Agentic AI" based on LLMs does not work reliably yet and very likely never will.

    If you complain about bugs in traditional (deterministic) software, you ain't seen nothing yet. A probabilistic system such as an LLM might or might not book the correct flight for you. It might give you the information you have asked for or it might delete your inbox instead.

    As a consequence of a system being probabilistic, anything you do with it works or fails based on probabilities. This really is the dumbest timeline.

  • 'I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb': OpenClaw AI chose to 'speedrun' deleting Meta AI safety director's inbox due to a 'rookie error'

    Jump

  • Can someone explain to mr why these people are buying Mac Minis to run this in a "safe" environment and then they go on and connect it to the internet and give the AI credentials to all their cloud accounts? This seems excessively moronic to me? Am I missing something?

  • Windows 11 just lost 5% market share in two months despite Windows 10 losing support.

    Jump

  • Yeah the Antrophic guys are also firmly in the "believer" group.

  • Windows 11 just lost 5% market share in two months despite Windows 10 losing support.

    Jump

  • I think that Satya Nadella and a lot of other CEO types genuinely believe in AI, as misguided as it seems. This is more about who they choose to listen too than having an actual understanding of the technology and its limits. And probably some FOMO sprinkled on top.

    Sam Altman knows what's up though and so does Jensen Huang. In this gold rush one is peddling the fake gold and the other is selling the shovels.

  • Windows 11 just lost 5% market share in two months despite Windows 10 losing support.

    Jump

  • Do you have a source for that backtracking about AI? I think they did not mention that explicitly. Instead they were talking about unrelated improvements. The CEO is still in denial about AI bloat. He seems unable to comprehend that people don't like to be force fed AI everywhere across the OS.