At that point, we as a country deserve whatever we get.
I'm not saying this isn't true, just please don't drag the rest of the world with you. Psychos in the world are taking notes, if Trump wins they'll follow his lead.
I have free prime through my ISP. I still pirate the content. I started even before the full blown ads, when they had "previews" of other shows and movies.
You might be too young to remember, but DRM existed way before Steam, and the worse ones that exist today are the ones that the Devs/publishers add, not the steam one.
That's what you're missing. Those are not language models nor use neural networks. At best they use a classification NLP. They do not generate text, use pick pre-constructed answers based on the inputs. Because it this three's no confidence beyond "what's generally the correct based on this keyword"
I've worked with IBM Watson. That existed and was used for basic bots a decade ago. You have you manually feed the terms to outputs.
Y he usado la web de la agencia tributaria para confirmar lo que digo.
I don't think this is the proper channel for feedback.
Rude
Fuck you. This is an optional extension for those who want to try. Do you want the final version of a piece of free software? Then you can go lie in a ditch because hopefully it will continue to evolved for years. It's astonishing the entitlement of some people.
Good local LLM that can run on most hardware is a very interesting project. Usually you need at least a GPU to get it to run. The fact that is only summarizing might be because it this.
The example you shared is not an LLM. It's a classic chatbot with pre-defined answers. It basically knows keyword to KB article.
If no term is known, it will tell "I don't know". It will also suggest incorrect KB if picks one keyword, ignoring the rest of the context. It has no idea of the answer is correct by any means. At best somebody will periodically check a sample of questions that the user didn't consider correct to evaluate the pairings, but it's not AI, at least not a good one
The reality is that the gender and race of the main character has little to do with it being fascist. What makes it fascist is that it depicts the cop as the most important and trustworthy member of the team.
Then this article disagrees with you because it only focused on the race and gender.
I'm not versed enough in paw patrol to know if it's the most important member of the team, most of the time they have to solve everything through collaboration of each expertise.
Everything else you said it's not relevant to this.
I've went through the article and it's ckickbait at best, garbage at worst.
Regarding paw patrol, the criticism is that the child is a white male and a mother that complains that in a two pup mission on an episode she saw the two pups were male.
Are you really telling me that is the boy was Japanese then the show wouldn't be fascist? Or a single chromosome would make it ok?
There's real fascism running around but somehow that's overlooked in favor of calling fascism to everything else.
That's a problem for HR if they have shitty retention.