Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
127
Comments
432
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The earth will be fine. It’s been through way worse than us. There was about a billion years when the whole thing was just a snowball. People don’t even really know how microbial life that was adapted for the surface survived, although the theory is that its little lifeboats were melted pools of water near volcanic hotspots, some sort of liquid water that incredibly enough was able to randomly stay around the whole time through. It only takes a very small number of survivors to repopulate everything once it turns okay again. The earth has been through oceans at the poles and total freezes and meteor strike apocalypses and everything in between, some of where we came from was the engine of creation in the wake of one of those disasters, the end of the dinosaurs.

    The paradise place we call home, though, is cooked and done for forever, on any kind of human timeline. There is 0 chance that what we call a livable biosphere, the kind of green grass nice summer day paradise we were born into, will still be around in a hundred years. It’s gone. We’re the last generation.

    There’s still a lot we can do to choose less apocalyptic options. The sheer massive scale of the disaster means that every fraction of a percent could save millions of lives, or significantly reduce the chance of total extinction. But bottom line, the planet itself and the web of life that lives on it will persist. Whether we will, certainly whether our civilization will, is uncertain, it will be determined by this generation and the next.

  • Father: Though time may have softened my edges and given me wisdom, I still have danger within me. Be cautious.

    Son: MURDER ALWAYS MURDER

  • But then where will I deploy my AI moderator?

  • I wanted to make sure I sat down and really replied to you before because I generally like your takes and respect you as a person, and a quick reply from my phone would be impossible as a medium for replying to your thoughtful and well stated argument.

    Yeah, all good. I mean maybe I am wrong, we can talk about it.

    My issue with Substack isn’t that there’s Nazis on there, it’s that Substack’s owners made sure they were there, and made sure they got a cut of the revenue sharing scheme.

    Okay so this is actually one of the issues that made me start to say that this is deliberate disinformation, not just people saying some stuff I don't agree with. The thing is: I don't think this is actually true. I saw a big article that made this claim, I dug into the details, and it turned out to be one of those "Ship of Theseus" things where, the people they invited were not the Nazis, just some random people with MAGA-type ideas, and they hadn't expressed those MAGA-type ideas until long after Substack's dealings with them had been and gone (pre-2017 Matt Taibbi I think was one). Basically, Substack in this aspect did nothing wrong at all. But people wrapped it up like they had sought out Richard Spenser and invited him to the platform and made sure to give him some money to get things started, which is false, and it was weird that people were trying so hard to say that that had happened. What they did was took millions of dollars from VCs and then gave it to good journalists.

    Who are you talking about when you say the Substack owners made sure there were Nazis? I want to dig into this a little bit more and where you heard that from.

    There's a whole separate issue of them allowing for real neo-Nazis. I'm probably in the vast minority, but I actually think that was fine. It's the same like I think Hasan Piker can say whatever the fuck he wants, it's the same like I think nutomic can have transphobic views if he wants. I think it is fine.

    Like I say, I'm probably the minority there.

    considered it important to Substack’s future that those Nazis be present and paid.

    The question I find myself asking is what views do they hold, what do they tolerate, and how long until they find a new way to promote those views or allow someone to co-opt their waveforms to broadcast their message to us.

    Just to be clear: Are you saying that they're in any way promoting or in favor of Nazis? Or just that they allow them on the platform and that's the huge problem?

    I've seen the first thing, and I think that's what you're saying, but if you are saying the second thing it's a different conversation.

    I guess ultimately, what I’m driving at, is that it is my view that Substack, like Medium, is a captured outlet. It can only ever show you a distorted version of the truth that serves its holders of power, who are ultimately aligned with the techbroligarchs that are strangling all of us.

    I don't think any of this is true. I haven't seen any indication at all that they're distorting anything about the blogs that are hosted there, and the very nature of them (as far as I'm aware) makes it pretty difficult for them to start rigging the algorithm to promote one instead of another, or anything like that.

    I do think it's a problem that Substack is a centralized platform. That I will 100% agree with you on. The point being that regardless of whether the current owners are up to anything, there's the strong likelihood in the future that it will succumb to the inevitable like so many before it.

    I think Ghost is probably a much better model, to be honest. On the other hand, because Substack is centralized, they were able to subsidize good journalism to get the ball rolling, and I think that was a really good thing. And, of course, it's absolutely impossible to keep Nazis off of Ghost either. Actually, even the purge of Nazis that Substack eventually did, would be impossible on Ghost, because its decentralized nature means they would be there to stay if they chose Ghost. It's more or less impossible to stop, generally speaking. (Which is part of why I agree with Substack's original stance on it.)

    Does this make sense?

  • The equation "Substack = Nazis" is textbook political misinformation: A thing with a technical grain of truth, entirely missing the point and then dishonestly presented, for the purpose of splintering and confusing the left and getting them to attack each other. I suspect it is deliberately promoted by enemies, because while it has a technical little fig-leaf of truthfulness, it bears so little resemblance to anything real or relevant and is a convenient way to shit on one of the chief leftist platforms for thought and journalism, and leftists love nothing more than a contest of "I am so pure that I hate this thing that everyone else likes because it's actually evil and I'm super clever and informed so I can see that and you can't and I'm the first one."

    I guess it is possible that people came up with this all on their own as a purity-test (actually I do think that the original campaign which persuaded Substack to get rid of most of the Nazis, was that), and it's just a general leftist self-own because of that tendency. I do feel like it's pretty likely that it has started coming in in some way from outside though. When this argument is presented in print form, it often has so many hallmarks of propaganda or slanty dishonest framings associated with it that it's hard for me to think that it is entirely self-created organic purity testing gone awry.

    Here was my conversation about the details of the underlying Substack Nazi issue the last time it came up. I don't have a lot to add to it: https://ponder.cat/post/1721638/1949850

  • Hey, look, I found some.

  • But to address your request for more information on that admittedly poorly chosen example: that was at the start at the Russian invasion, so I don’t have the source readily available. It might have been Jacobin or a YT geopolitical analyst based in Europe.

    Not what I asked. I asked you for general reliable sources about the world, since your international friends are in touch with them and all read them and they're 100% up to speed on things that idiot Americans are not aware of. I want to know these sources, not this specific claim, but just in general. Surely you want to help me not be a blithering idiot in my news consumption anymore?

    IDK, maybe your answer is "YouTube and Jacobin." I do watch YouTube and I'm familiar with Jacobin.

    I come to Lemmy for conversations that are fun, funny, thought-provoking, and helpful. So, on that note, I’m out. Enjoy your day.

    Seems to me like you come to Lemmy to snidely insinuate weird pro-Russian points of view, and then become super-friendly and say it was all a big misunderstanding, brother, when someone calls you on it, and then say it wasn't important and flee into the darkness when asked for details. I stand behind my rudeness to you, it seems like it was well-earned. You're welcome to defend "US manipulating geopolitics with UA and RU so as to bring the EU to heel," if you want to, but since you don't want to, have a wonderful evening.

  • even I said “WAT,” i.e. my disbelief regarding conclusions at which some people outside the US arrived.

    That's not what you said. You said that it was, more or less, a universal consensus outside the US that the US had manipulated events in Ukraine to weaken the EU, because they couldn't stand having the EU around because it was a real democracy. So much so that you're a "blithering idiot" "out of the loop" "depth and breadth of ignorance" and so on because you don't see it that way because you consume US media, whereas the whole rest of the world knows that that's going on. Right?

    That assertion (that it's universally believed outside the US, not even touching on whether it is true) is absolutely wrong. And then, you said "WAT" about your own reaction to it, but also seemed to take it very seriously, comparing it favorably to your own ideas which you were very negative about.

    Would you care to elaborate on how I called commenters here misinformed?

    You said "us," as in "it becomes very difficult for us to be anything other than idiots".

    I feel like you are digging for an argument that doesn’t exist.

    If you would like more clarification or elaboration, rather than making assumptions, I’m happy to discuss.

    Okay, sure. Maybe that's fair. So tell me: What are these reliable sources that your more wise and knowledgeable international friends read, what's some of what they tell you about geopolitics and the war in Ukraine? Specifically as pertains to "US manipulating geopolitics with UA and RU so as to bring the EU to heel." Since you've identified the idea that that is not happening as the "blithering idiot" viewpoint by contrast, maybe you can help me out of my idiocy by helping and elaborating.

    Edit: Rephrasing

  • Let’s set aside the veracity of the US manipulating geopolitics in the UA/RU war

    Let's not. That's the exact point at which you departed from accuracy into fantasy-land, and what I was taking note of.

    Can we all agree that the US has a long history of fuckery when it comes to stomping out anything it doesn’t like or isn’t in line with corporate interests?

    Yes, 100%.

    Even if the independent journalist were absolutely presenting the truth, it’s still feels like tinfoil hat shit because of how severely we’re inculcated by “trustworthy” news sources in the US.

    I like to think I’m a teeny bit media- and news-savvy, but damn… most days I really feel like a blithering idiot.

    This is an impressive type of sophisticated negging whereby you criticize yourself as a way to implicitly criticize the reader, and tell them they're an idiot.

    Most of Lemmy and most of the content on Lemmy isn't from the US as far as I'm aware. This whole media blackout you're talking about is a very real thing for most US people, but it simply won't apply on Lemmy or the sources that are usually prevalent on Lemmy. For example I host some news sources on rss.ponder.cat; four out of the top five of the popular ones are non-US sources.

    If you are telling the truth about your self-assessment, I would really urge you to re-examine that leap you took from "most US readers are misinformed" to "most of the people in these comments are misinformed" and definitely the one you took to "US is skillfully manipulating the Ukraine situation, and definitely not fucking it up because they don't care about much of the issues involved all that much, except insofar as their friends can sell tons of weapons to all parties involved."

  • Talking with my longtime acquaintances and friends in CA, DE, VN, and JP, the conversations invariably become “Did you hear about [current event causal factors]? This is super obvious, and here is [their reliable news sources].” Well, shit.

    Tru dat

    For example, the one that really blew me away was the US manipulating geopolitics with UA and RU so as to bring the EU to heel.

    Lolwut

    Never change, lemmy.world. Your opinions are always a magical adventure.

  • I don't think this is really true as long as they're complying with the DMCA. OP can upload stuff, it'll stay up until someone notices and cares enough to send a takedown notice, and then the server host will take it down. In theory OP might be liable if they really wanted to push it, which maybe makes it not the best idea, but I think the server operator is in the clear as long as they take stuff down if it does get requested to.

  • I'll speak for myself, I was well aware.

  • I cannot possibly imagine that they are not planning to make the attempt.

  • Not really, at least the carrier was not actively being shelled while he was doing his big thumbs-up.

    Fun fact, also, they had to spend time flipping the carrier around in the water so that San Diego wouldn't be in the background and people could assume that he was in the middle of the Persian Gulf I guess.

    While researching that last little bit, I also found this:

    The White House claimed that the banner was requested by the crew of the ship, who did not have the facilities for producing such a banner. Later, the administration and naval sources said that the banner was the Navy's idea, White House staff members made the banner, and it was hung by Navy sailors. White House spokesman Scott McClellan told CNN, "We took care of the production of it. We have people to do those things. But the Navy actually put it up."[11] According to John Dickerson of Time magazine, the White House later conceded that they hung the banner but still insisted it had been done at the request of the crew members.[12]

    Oh, for those innocent days when we thought that was a big crew of morons and liars who were fucking up directing the ship of state.

  • See my other comment. I wasn't saying at all that Lemmy was a US-only thing, I was just trying to say that that the whole network is probably enough of a niche platform that it's not worth the substantial effort that would be involved in trying to interfere too much with US users on non-US instances. Big instances in the US, they can fuck with, and so why not (and especially since the Take it Down act is structured to empower individuals to go after them without the government needing to spend resources on it.) Instances outside the US, never mind, we have bigger fish to fry.

  • Oh, I am sure most of Lemmy is outside the US. I was saying that, in general, Lemmy (and even Mastodon) is probably too small and difficult a problem for them to want to attack through any systematic method. I think, if anything, they'll just surveil and punish individual US-based users as opposed to trying to shut down or block instances outside the US.

    It's one of the advantages of ActivityPub services. Bluesky will be easy for them to attack at the root and I fully expect them to do so, whereas for truly federated services I think the reaction will be "ah what the hell too much trouble, how much harm can they really do."

  • No, they will just make server operators liable for obeying any conservative who has an issue with any content there and can make the right format of complaint.

    I suspect that instances outside the US will simply be too small a factor to bother with. Small, scattered opposition that is subject to deliberate trolling and disruption at any scale anyone feels like deploying will simply not be worth bothering with.

    This is all assuming if a big internet-censorship operation starts (which it seems likely that it will). I think it will mainly focus on large based-in-the-US companies which host large services. Notably among them will be Bluesky. The only impact it will have on anything ActivityPub-based is that they will shut down or muzzle some big instances inside the US, and then, the point being made, they will probably move on, leaving instances outside the US to do whatever they want. That's my prediction.

    Oh, also, Palantir's surveillance will incorporate people's comments into their overall dossier on the person, regardless of where their instance is, which means that anyone who maintains a big presence on an ActivityPub network will be putting themselves at person risk of neo-deportation to somewhere they can never get free from. It will still be legal to do, though. Sure.

  • Fishing?

  • Fight for… what? My fellow Americans?

    Yes. Some of them don't have the option. It's either be here safe, or have ICE kick in their door and fuck them up. Some of them just want to do science. Some of them are wanting to turn the resources of the richest country in history to solving big problems like climate change. There are important things and people happening in the US that are worth defending. At least try.

    The Trump people, you can fight to educate better and rescue from the economic circumstances that primed them up to line up behind fascism. Not for their sake, fuck 'em. But for the sake of everyone else who will be a victim once their confusion and violence becomes law.

  • If it's a tech interview, practice solving coding problems in a tech interview format.

    Find simple "coding challenge" problems, write the answers on paper, get satisfied with them, then run them and see what happens. Definitely at least cover the basics (reverse a linked list, quicksort). Do it until you're comfortable with it, which takes a while. You will start to ace programming tests because the calibrated response is for someone who does programming in a totally different format, and you're comfortable and experienced with the unusual format.

  • US News @ponder.cat

    Voice of America to resume airing after court halts Trump’s dismantling of broadcaster

    www.theguardian.com /us-news/2025/may/03/voice-of-america-trump-return-to-air
  • Trump Watch @lemm.ee

    Trump promised to help Big Oil. Its revenues plummeted.

    grist.org /climate-energy/trump-promised-to-help-big-oil-its-revenues-plummeted/
  • US News @ponder.cat

    Army brass declare for right to repair

    go.theregister.com /feed/www.theregister.com/2025/05/02/us_secretary_of_the_army/
  • US News @ponder.cat

    A ‘political prisoner’: US advocates rally for detained Georgetown scholar

    www.aljazeera.com /news/2025/5/2/a-political-prisoner-us-advocates-rally-for-detained-georgetown-scholar
  • US News @ponder.cat

    Dominion confident Virginia wind farm will get done, despite Trump

    www.eenews.net /articles/dominion-confident-virginia-wind-farm-will-get-done-despite-trump/
  • US News @ponder.cat

    Texas Lawyer Harassed At Home By Federal Agents, Fired By His Employer After He Tells His Story

    www.techdirt.com /2025/05/01/texas-lawyer-harassed-at-home-by-federal-agents-fired-by-his-employer-after-he-tells-his-story/
  • Trump Watch @lemm.ee

    Trump Executive Order Says It’s Time To ‘Unleash’ Cops, Turn America Into A Police State

    www.techdirt.com /2025/04/30/trump-executive-order-says-its-time-to-unleash-cops-turn-america-into-a-police-state/
  • Trump Watch @lemm.ee

    Billionaire Isaacman takes big step toward leading Nasa

    www.bbc.com /news/articles/c5yg30dlp1vo
  • US News @ponder.cat

    New York Post Story Shows Why Voter Impersonation Fraud Almost Never Happens

    electionlawblog.org
  • US News @ponder.cat

    NYC Joins National Effort to Ban Cellphone Use in Schools

    www.nytimes.com /2025/04/29/nyregion/nyc-schools-cellphone-ban.html
  • Trump Watch @lemm.ee

    Trump border pick accused of ‘cover-up’ over death of man beaten by US agents

    www.theguardian.com /us-news/2025/apr/29/trump-customs-border-protection-rodney-scott
  • US News @ponder.cat

    US says 2 Ukrainian nationals detained for alleged illegal voting in 2024 presidential election

    kyivindependent.com /us-says-2-ukrainian-nationals-detained-in-us-over-alleged-illegal-voting-in-2024-election
  • US News @ponder.cat

    The New Jersey fire signals a new era for the Northeast

    grist.org /wildfires/the-new-jersey-fire-signals-a-new-era-for-the-northeast/
  • US News @ponder.cat

    Oil companies have downplayed extent of spills in Gulf of Mexico, investigation finds

    news.mongabay.com /2025/04/oil-companies-have-downplayed-extent-of-spills-in-gulf-of-mexico-investigation-finds/
  • US News @ponder.cat

    Philadelphia Is Expanding its Network of Roundabouts

    www.planetizen.com /news/2025/04/134864-philadelphia-expanding-its-network-roundabouts
  • US News @ponder.cat

    Louisiana Judge Nullifies Death Row Inmate’s Murder Conviction That Was Based on Junk Science

    www.propublica.org /article/jimmie-duncan-murder-conviction-nullified-death-row
  • US News @ponder.cat

    Utah declares drought emergency

    www.eenews.net /articles/utah-declares-drought-emergency/
  • US News @ponder.cat

    ICE Awarded a $3.8 Billion Contract to Hold Immigrants on a Military Base. Days Later, It Was Canceled.

    www.propublica.org /article/ice-cancels-contract-immigrant-detention-camp-fort-bliss
  • US News @ponder.cat

    Earthjustice President Describes a “Fundamentally Different” Era of Hostility Toward Environmentalists

    www.propublica.org /article/earthjustice-abigail-dillen-q-a
  • Not The Onion @lemmy.world

    Business Insider Founder Creates AI Exec For His New Newsroom, Immediately Hits On Her

    www.404media.co /business-insider-founder-creates-ai-exec-for-his-new-newsroom-immediately-hits-on-her/