Because (generic) you have no right to your child's information when attending higher learning institutions, no matter your child's age per FERPA. As it was explained to me, when attending higher learning institutions, it's understood that the child is basically an adult and should be treated as such, which affords them the right to privacy, even from their parents. They can authorize you if they so choose, but it's their choice.
Having heard the arguments I got from helicopter parents, it's much needed. The amount of grief I got from assholes who couldn't be bothered to talk to their kids was insane (especially the kids who had a note on their account to not let anyone do phone resets because parents were willing to impersonate their kid to IT to break into their account)
Coming from someone over a decade past helldesk work, it wasn't a typo.
My favorite were university parents who were so sure they were legally allowed to look into their (under 18) kid's grades and shit, and really did not appreciate that we did not give a fuck who they were if we didn't have sign off from the student (and even then, we told them to fuck off and go to the admin building cuz we ain't authorized to give you access to a fucking thing).
Supporters say the measure tackles the problem before a downloadable file becomes an untraceable weapon. Everytown for Gun Safety says recoveries of 3D-printed crime guns across 20 cities have risen nearly 1,000% over the past five years, and argues that cheaper, more capable printers are already being used in illegal ghost gun operations.
Ooooh, that's two large red flags for me (disregarding the litany of red flags the concept in general has). Every town being involved makes me question the data on its face, given the number of times I saw gang violence near a school out of school hours listed as a school shooting in their database, as does a large percentage increase with no hard numbers. If they recovered 1 gun last year and 11 this year, that's a 1000% increase, but the percentage sounds so much worse than the real number.
Only if they're not already focused on you. Once they are, trying to get away is likely to get you shot in the back when they fear for their lives because you're running away or something.
Pride month is when tons of companies would performatively boast about how much they support pride, but with der fuhrer in the office, they're not even going to put on the performance. Especially after Target pulled all public support because they faced a bit of backlash, and that was before the bullshit that's happened in the last year.
The problem, as indirectly noted in the article, is that they're using the white house as a source, which isn't reliable in the slightest anymore, and the article explicitly noted that the white house is using them for market manipulation.
Axios is a convenient punching bag for this administration's blatant insider trading and market manipulation. No wonder hacks like Greene and Kinzinger are blaming the messenger, and conveniently not going after the trump admin when they all have a common enemy.
Same, I even met with a few smiths and really enjoyed the process. Ultimately, not enough time/space/money to get into it, so I just do chain mail instead. Makes a good stim.
An AI consultant tells Axios one of their clients recently spent half a billion dollars in a single month after failing to put usage limits on Claude licenses for employees.
It would help if you provided more than unsourced claims and what amounts to telling me to do my own research to figure out your point. As is, I don't know what you believe past a general disagreement with basic points, only that you're apparently unable or unwilling to support it, so I have to assume you can't support it after multiple attempts at good faith discussion.
So maybe actually explain why you see this as FUD, or I'm going to take that as confirmation you know your argument is wrong. At this point, I have to assume you're wasting time and just desperate to get the last word.
If anyone had any doubts, you've effectively admitted you're wrong. You can't even respond to basic questions about the "FUD" anyone is spreading, especially your own.
Maybe try to shill in places that don't know how to ask basic follow up questions, you'll probably get farther.
Yeah, this is the part we're disagreeing on, because so far I haven't seen a real justification for why the same app is fine on windows but not Linux and is only accessible on linux through a subscription. What part of Linux specifically costs them money that doesn't on windows?
Also, just because you don't like the info doesn't make it dubious. And ironically, your defense of them is dubious by providing vague responses and unsupported accusations of spreading FUD.
Because (generic) you have no right to your child's information when attending higher learning institutions, no matter your child's age per FERPA. As it was explained to me, when attending higher learning institutions, it's understood that the child is basically an adult and should be treated as such, which affords them the right to privacy, even from their parents. They can authorize you if they so choose, but it's their choice.
Having heard the arguments I got from helicopter parents, it's much needed. The amount of grief I got from assholes who couldn't be bothered to talk to their kids was insane (especially the kids who had a note on their account to not let anyone do phone resets because parents were willing to impersonate their kid to IT to break into their account)