Sure, it doesn't follow logically. I don't think the right operates on logic. Impeachment only exists as a political weapon to them since it does not serve to hold presidents accountable.
Alright, pal. I don't know what to tell you. Ronald Reagan was a criminal, both Bushes are criminals, Clinton is a criminal, Obama is a criminal, and Biden is a criminal. If there was a will to impeach for something real, it could happen.
I don't think they have been witch hunts, per se; republicans don't seek impeachment for things they rightly could because, well, they like the illegal things presidents do. They like when presidents don't enforce the law or drag usninto wars or fund foreign enemies and topple governments. Democrats too. If rightful impeachment isn't on the table, what else can it be but a political weapon?
In 2011, there was a lightly steam-punk (Davinci-punk?) Three Musketeers movie with a villanous Orlando Bloom that set up for a sequel. We never got that sequel because only I liked it. It was, by no means, high art. I just like Alexander Dumas.
If I had my way, those people would have affordable housing, public health care, and a fat ham for Christmas dinner. They get to have it THEIR way, and I don't think it makes one the same as a right-wing dipshit to think that self-inflicted injury is very funny.
If judges didn't want to be looked at with suspicion, then they should stop collectively consenting to dipshit interpretations of the law. It might not be so in this particular instance, but it popped up a pretty convenient time, politically speaking.
ICE: New recruits, you say?