I might be simple to please but I think 1080p or 2160p is just peak to me. I find it very difficult to notice differences between 1080p and 2160p but moreso with 2160p and 4K. When Blu-Ray came out, they were of course hamming up Blu-Ray as the shit and DVD was now seen as inferior. I never really cared for what Blu-Ray had to offer at the time of it's debut. Because DVD quality was more than efficient to me, better than VHS which the comparison between VHS and DVD was night and day.
People tend to like tricking others into going into the more premium and expensive options of the latest tech with dishonest comparisons. You see this all the time with graphical comparisons with games and movies. Where they'll deliberately pixelate what they see as an inferior visual and sharpen the later options. It's just dishonest and operates on an extreme bias.
I can't tell you how many times I've gotten scrutinized whenever I've pointed out to some other people, about how abused the word 'security' has gotten in the tech world. If people not in the know, so much see the word 'security' and are promised to be secure, they'll happily sign away everything for it.
When the word itself is artificial in that scenario. Why does Google need my street address for "security" of my account when 2FA is a thing and strengthening your password is another? There's nothing secure about prying me for sensitive information than it would be if you've performed regular scans or something that ensured my account is secure and not hacked into.
I am annoyed everytime I want to make a transfer on my bank dashboard from account to account. They give me "one-time" codes all the time to do simple actions and they do that for "security purposes".
No, I disagree, it's to nag me to fucking death.