For filehosts probably at least 90% of all uploads are illegal if you ask a copyright lawyer. 🥴 But that's mostly just people sharing culture.
Of course damn CSAM is a different (and actual) kind of issue and plain awful to deal with. If I remember correctly some organisation from the US provides a free list of checksums of known crap that's circulating to automatically check media file signatures against, I think that's the first thing I'd look for to have some baseline defense against those disgusting fucks. Or (depending on your jurisdiction) even be compatible with the law for public hosting services.
Better use Tor & a trustworthy search engine when looking for infos how to implement such an upload filter, I wouldn't trust automated systems from Google to not misinterpret your intention with these topics.
Oh wow, this went completely under my radar (how didn't anyone brought it up in any of the videos recently made about how shitty Bambu is?). Seems like at least a few people didn't know though, so I'm just leaving it here. :)
If you mean that everyone can now build something that most likely will fall apart in the future, where nobody knows what's actually inside as nobody reads it, where you might get hit with copyright claims because you stole code willy-nilly (you can't hide behind the AI, you did it), that is full of security issues as well as structural nonsense and you may never know if the LLM decides to delete everything star anew while blasting a 6000€ hole in your pocket doing do…
Bambu also is a no-go for quality reasons by now, they didn't care for their printers catching fire for way too long.
That article, while technically being correct on many things, is also a little bit hyperbolic (that picture with "Who's copying who now" is just laughable at best and utterly misleading). Prusa is still the best choice in what we call this "open market" (which repeatedly fucked them over), including openness.
Viable alternatives, including cheaper ones, would be Snapmaker's U1 and printers from Qidi Tech or Sovol. Mind that Qidi Tech and Sovol are somewhat known for sub-par customer support (they have to save the money somewhere I guess). Qidi Tech is better for "set up and use", Sovol is a good baseline to tinker with the printer itself as well.
Keep in mind that Prusa printers absolutely excel in longevity though, and they're the only ones known to offer upgrade paths. Not to mention data security when using their services… just saying there are good reasons their printers are more expensive. You'll most likely have more from them for longer. Not the MK4S though, that one is very much last gen by now.
No, they fucking don't. These differences matter a lot especially because LLMs behave so human-like (as it was trained on us) and we got way, WAY too many people already treating them like equals, work buddies, friends or even fucking falling in love with a tool (ever heard multiple people genuinely fall in love with a power drill or a toaster, or killing themselves because the table saw told them they're the messiah?). Words matter, especially in regards to what we call "Medienkompetenz" in german (lit. "media competency", meaning bring educated in how to safely consume and use any kind of media or digital tool). And even more especially with AI, where not just the salesmen but even the tool itself tells us it can do shit it certainly can not while trying to abuse our emotional weaknesses.
Collaboration(merriam-webster.com)
"to work jointly with others or together especially in an intellectual endeavor"
You do not "collaborate" with a fucking toaster. If you think you do with an AI then your Medienkompetenz is lacking and you will eventually, even accidentally, put too much trust in what is essentially a game of chance and the machine will fuck you over, on which it will just say "You're absolutely right!" while you have to witness all the consequences of your action (an AI can't take responsibility because it's just a bunch of complex math). The fact this tool uses natural language doesn't change anything except your impression of it.
Stop subtly treating LLMs like a god damn entity, you're fooling yourself.
I don't agree with your take on AI and the comparison at all, however if you want to use them and stay independent in the future it's probably best to use Mistral. Their models are available for download and (mostly) licensed under Apache 2.0. You only have to pay for commercial use. Also they're basically the only big EU-company in that space and the only I know of where the web interface isn't infested with trackers and shit. However they are also involved in the military (guess which edge models are running on those semi-autonomous drones in Ukraine).
All I need to know is does it solve a problem I have, does it work, is it stable, and is it secure.
They do not produce secure code on their own. Keys end up client-side, in widely opened S3 buckets, encryption falsely implemented etc. Widely known, no link needed.
You can not "collaborate" with an LLM as it has no agency on its own, merely the simulation of it. You use it as a tool, that's it. It also has no inherent expertise on anything (let alone a deep one), it merely generates the closest match which is why it will confidently do total nonsense so often. To use AI as tool safely and correctly you can only ever use it in domains you already know enough to understand when the LLM completely derails. Therefore I (as an example) can use and understand it for research on coding (but not letting it generate code for production, oh my god), but could never use it for finance advise as it could tell me any kind of nonsense without me being able to pick up on it.
You're right on some things, like that AI is marketed and used the wrong way. It's also made the wrong way by stealing literally the collected works of mankind, so to have reasonable approach to AI / LLMs as tool you have to be really cautious, use it carefully and quite frankly skip the media (pictures, audio) generation completely. That one is morally corrupt even in small amounts, plain and simply.
Right?! A Mini+ refresh that pushes down the costs without sacrificing performance (very much doable I think, they'd have basically zero R&D cost for that) to hit the 249€ mark would most likely sell like hot cakes, simply because it's both rather affordable and Prusa! Especially right now.
I do hope they work on something. The fact the website apparently only offers the Mini+ Enclosure Bundle by now might indicate they're emptying shelves, though they'll never sell those off at that ridiculous price (500€ semi-assembled).
Just be safe, alright? There should be info out there if it's an A1 about removing the dangerous part (seems to be optional). And make sure to take those devices offline via LAN-mode and blocking their internet access in the router.
For filehosts probably at least 90% of all uploads are illegal if you ask a copyright lawyer. 🥴 But that's mostly just people sharing culture.
Of course damn CSAM is a different (and actual) kind of issue and plain awful to deal with. If I remember correctly some organisation from the US provides a free list of checksums of known crap that's circulating to automatically check media file signatures against, I think that's the first thing I'd look for to have some baseline defense against those disgusting fucks. Or (depending on your jurisdiction) even be compatible with the law for public hosting services.
Better use Tor & a trustworthy search engine when looking for infos how to implement such an upload filter, I wouldn't trust automated systems from Google to not misinterpret your intention with these topics.