Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
2
Comments
435
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Rider here for serious work. It's also free for non commercial use if that works for you.

  • I'd say educational system, or better, it's downfall through decades, plays a significant role in making population dumb enough to not see through these constant lies.

  • They did, nobody wanted to talk.

  • So, there is value in labels after all?

  • So, you do get benefits from Spotify, don't you? Besides, there are other streaming services around that supposedly pay better - as you said. Anyway, all good to you, hope you succeed and Spotify dies one day.

  • What is stopping them? But it seems that general consensus here is that artists would like you to listen for free and here and there buy something from them.

  • It is really refreshing how this thread spins in "we know what's best for the artists, certainly not paying for listening to their streams, that's exactly what they want". If you don't want to use Spotify, that's fine, I don't want to either because they are an awful company. But that doesn't make you the person who create the rules for artists nor does it give you the permission to listen to illegal content.

  • right back atcha!

    How so? You are the wiser what artists really wants - not being paid for listening to their music and would like you to listen to it for free. I merely follow what they offer and not trying to listen to it illegally.

  • It might shock you, but content on YouTube gets paid. And illegal sources out there don't make it more legal to share it. It's funny though, you are basically saying what? Listen for free, middle finger to authors, and buy merchandise? As opposite to listen legally, authors get something and buy merchandise? But hey, I'm glad that you speak for authors.

  • It's not just Spotify, it content is free for all, then who is buying?

  • How many buyers are there is if entire archive is available for free? 10? 20?

  • I don't use Spotify, either. And do what you want to do, nobody is forcing your to put your music on Spotify.

  • First, what am I using is beyond the point and I'm not using Spotify because of their payment method and their politics. And again, if albums are on streaming services, they are voluntarily there, are they not?

  • You underestimate people and their motivation to listen for free no matter what.

  • Yes, sure, but if those don't get paid, artists don't get paid. And artists are not forced to pick a label, they are free to go solo, but they still prefer labels, so it's not that black and white labels bad, artists good

  • So the artists get paid even less than from Spotify?

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • It should be the other way round - AI opt in.

  • I use cake build to create the build script and then I can run it from wherever.

  • Another alternative that I know of is Rider which supports Android apps with .NET. But it's not OSS nor supports Kotlin. I'd like to see an alternative as well, but I fear unless Jetbrains creates something else (and most probably they won't) there will be no other options.