Skip Navigation

Posts
31
Comments
2545
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • In a letter to DOJ prosecutors, first flagged by independent journalist Mary Wheeler, Fort’s lawyers referred to a phone call with DOJ lawyer Ned Hedley in which they got the indication that “the government does not intend to respond to our correspondence in writing, out of the concern expressed on the call that what it represents to us could be put before the Court and/or otherwise used against it.”

    It’s an astounding thing for government lawyers to say, especially considering that documenting conversations is a basic requirement in the legal profession. Hedley’s words seem to indicate that the Trump administration is trying to hide something, or knows that its activities might not be legal.

    Every single Western government are especially Neville Chamberlain.

  • Nah, the Russians did the heavy work.

  • They can get that way.

  • The rest of the first world is complicit, but also good at theatre.

  • And any other perceived obstructions. And to gauge how well it might work in other/future scenarios.

  • Thanks for the explanation.

  • Other instances seem to be using Anubis. Perhaps join the matrix chat for Lemmy?

  • Not even close.

  • What's wrong with Anubis?

  • I worked for Google. I worked for Google at a time when… I don’t think they were as evil as they are now. And I worked for Google at a time when they did not use their technology for warfare or for governments. I really enjoyed my time at Google. And I am personally heartbroken at the path that they have taken, and I fully support the boycott of Google in order to support the Palestinian people.

    🫩

  • I have never been enticed to it, even when it supposedly would have greatly benefited me. I hope I'm able to continue to avoid it.

  • Some users have taken this idea to the extreme. Last summer, a British expat in Singapore, Candice Gallagher, made waves after posting a TikTok video in which she said LinkedIn had "A-grade filters" for finding "A-grade men" — namely, doctors, lawyers, and "finance bros." In the post, she touted the various filters you could use to track down ideal partners. More recently, a screenshot of the tech entrepreneur George Hotz's LinkedIn bio was shared on X. In his bio, Hotz declared that he now used the site "exclusively as a dating platform" and laid out a catalog of requisite attributes — "intelligent, attractive, female, in or visiting San Diego" — for his ideal match. "Send me a message and invite me out for a drink," he wrote.

    Yeaaaaah. No. Geohot? I haven't thought about him in forever. So I did a quick bit of searching.

    i offer some services: 30 minute consulting phone calls for $1,000 (no life advice, for business/technical discussion only) due diligence on a company/topic for $10,000 (will do a day of research and call with founder, great value) e-mail me to schedule and confirm, be ready to paypal and chat right away

    Is that in line with industry pricing now? I'm more out of touch than I imagined.

    Interesting blog.

    Since at least 2008, every time there’s an option to either make the money track real value or make sure things don’t go down, they chose the latter. As a result, money is increasingly uncoupled from reality.

    From Cory Doctorow’s blog:

    The actual dead economy risk is that our institutions and markets will continue to move capital from productive activity into memestocks, vibes, and bubbles.

    I mean, I kind of get a vague picture and in* a vague way, I vaguely get it. Maybe.

    A home for poorly researched ideas that I find myself repeating a lot anyway

    And a couple of start ups.

  • Ask North American indigenous people how much any signatures have ever meant; or any other state.

  • Reminds me of some family members.

  • I investigated if that was the real headline. When MSM is consistently not defending and pointing out glaring flaws, the billionaire pedofile governing body has lost faith in the representative (not the mission), and is looking for another front/fall guy.

    Oops, that didn't go there.

  • Russia underwent liberal shock therapy. Putin fell in love with liberalism.

  • Undoubtedly, he didn't suddenly in love with liberalism, for no reason.

  • If the claims are true, they should be made.

  • Good. Probably on the take from the United States or a proxy.