We have communities, tags, and titles about as long(longer, I think?) as tweets used to be. There's also the expandable description text, which seems plenty long enough to include even entire articles. If all that is not enough to determine that clicking a link is or isn't worthwhile, the comments usually deliver.
Being generous to him, few places have such a stereotype of people being willing to take his advice as Japan. By which I mean, for 90% of the world, stating his opinion is even more pointless.
On The Other Hand, maybe he just wanted to try to get people to do it for his own gratification, and picked the most vulnerable targets he could think of.
I would be more interested in themed favicon sets like on Android or Linux DE's, and any way that would avoid Google or lock-in/forced updates to such as with the Play store or Windows I would avoid like the plague.
Gimme back .dll's full of icons I can create and edit to my liking. For modernization, meta-text(url or application name) for each icon instead of referencing "icon #x in this .dll", and a format more usefull than .dll's full of icons that all have to be the same size(and .tiff, .giff, or bitmaps at that, when jpeg and vector formats exist), but that's about it.
All this re-inventing-the-wheel/web2.0/3.0 shit is geared towards creating dependency and lock-in in the stupidest ways possible.
Go punch a Nazi. Or downvote. Maybe picket The Onion headquarters if that's your fancy? If this "slander" holds no weight, then why are you wasting your breath here?
They are celebrities, not political candidates. "Vote Blue No Matter Who" is disingenuous when the DNC weilds it, and not even remotely applicable to rich-ass celebrities whose entire political stance is to try to be "apolitical".
That was twelve years ago, and "please don't use our music for torture" is the bare minimum for people who want plausible deniability without actually doing anything about the fact that people are being tortured.
Don't confuse the awesome free service that once was with the paid brand that's still around. Still funny all the effort and good-will Metallica wasted to go after one site when plenty of alternatives existed.
Rofl. Imagine thinking I called out Metallica for taking down Napster alone.
Their shit's been used in DoD/weapons-contractor videos for decades, and the moment the MAGAts start to turn on Trump over the Epstien stuff, Metallica is suddenly anti-drone, for the first time ever.
Next you'll tell us NASCAR brought down the Berlin Wall.
Exactly. If your fucks are being wasted on being un-happy, stopping giving them. Can't fix a problem with the resources, tools, and/or assistance available to you? Repeat after me: I don't give a fuck about this right now, what else can I do?
My first thoughts went to a hyper-fixation on weight and presentation/musculature/grooming. All the negatives of being/wanting-to-be a woman today, with none of the perks, and potentially no resolution.
The day I stop advocating the potential for violence will be after I have left the US. All the authorities have to do to force unarmed protestors to turn "violent" is corral them into tighter and tighter spaces to where the protestors have no choice but to break windows and such just to have room to breathe.
Unarmed protestors are incapable of standing their ground in any meaningful way to prevent this. "Peaceful" vs "violent" protest is a false dichotomy.
We have communities, tags, and titles about as long(longer, I think?) as tweets used to be. There's also the expandable description text, which seems plenty long enough to include even entire articles. If all that is not enough to determine that clicking a link is or isn't worthwhile, the comments usually deliver.