Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
16
Comments
494
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I didn't say it wasn't real, it's just a scripting structure and not object oriented, so it doesn't make sense for it to start by looking for a "main" object

  • 7777777777777777777777777777777777777777

  • Are you implying that all of these are actually different representations of the same thing?

  • Julia is a regular nerd?

  • His blood sugar is high! Quickly!

    drags his comatose body to the nearest cooking class

    There we go!

  • What do you expect? Spending thisuch time around the strongest being in the universe, some of it leaks to others

  • It really doesn't. It's a scripting language, functions are there but at it's core it runs a script. The issue is that it was so easy to start with that people started doing everything in it, even though it sucks for anything past complex scripts

    It is the excel of databases.

  • Line them up, shoot Toby three times anyway

  • If I had a gun with 3 bullets and I was in a room with Meta, Hitler and Bin Laden. I would shoot Meta thrice.

  • More like green fudge

  • They are not extinct so I think they are nailing it

  • With 2.4kw you can just use it as a space heater, and a strong one at that!

  • Recently I found a new class of passive water aggregators in my snack. I call it ,"DO NOT EAT, SILICA"

  • Nice! You get an invisible candy!

  • I powered on my computer, my app started, which started my main app, which started my essential apps, which started my app that I use to open my other app, which I use to go to my other app that I use to watch other apps being used by otgher people.

    You will get an invisible candy if you can correctly decode this.

  • We need a "thank you for sharing and fuck that!" Option, not just a like and dislike

  • What do you expect? Half of these decision makers are complete idiots that are just good at making money and think that that means they are smarter than anyone who makes less than them. They then see some new hyped up tech, they chat with ChatGPT and they are dump enough to be floored by it's "intelligence" and now they think it can replace workers but since it's still early, they assume that it will quickly surpass the workers. So in their mind, firing ten programmers and saving like two million a year, while only spending maybe a few tens of thousands a year on AI will be a crazy success that will show how smart they are. And as time goes on and the AI gets better, they will save even more money. So why spend more money to help the programmers improve, when you can just fire them and spend a fraction of it on AI?

  • Between my butt cheeks as it helps me stay fit by clenching my butt all day.

    Also, in my roght pocket as I'm right handed and use my phone a lot.

  • Mark my words, a decade from now vibe coding won't be a thing because it will literally be calked regular coding and there will like "coding experts" or some shit that would basically be normal programmers that are good at it. And they will be tge only ones that can really solve novel problems.

    Or, AI will actually get to a point of being a real programmer and not a (very cool but still just a) tool.

    But just to cover my bases, it might also be neither.

    Welcome to my TED talk on how to never be wrong!