Yes. "Just" a misbalance in dopamine levels in the brain. Dopamine reuptake is too quick, there's too little dopamine available, so the brain's reward centre doesn't activate properly. That's pretty much what they're saying. Drugs can inhibit the reuptake, making more dopamine available longer.
Maybe for it manifesting. There are certainly very lucky people who grow up and live in environments that just so happen to not clash with them and who never even think they may have a neurodivergence.
"The quiet girl who is clearly not stupid and reads A LOT but has trouble organising herself will be fine, she'll be able to sort herself out, especially with the help of her parents who are both teachers - no cause for concern here, there are kids who very obviously need more help."
my teachers, probably, in the late 80s and 90s.
I don't exactly blame them, there really were kids who needed all their attention so I fell through the cracks.
"Having an influence" and "causing" are two different things. You seem to imply that what mum eats during pregnancy might directly cause the kid to have ADHD.
Just like video games don't make someone a school shooter, tiktok does not make people have ADHD. Both can exacerbate existing problems and people need to be aware of this and look at WHY kids in particular seem to spend a lot of time gaming / scrolling brainless videos. But the causes are more complex and inconvenient so society jumps on easy answers.
That presumes you can read the author's mind. It's impossible to tell with 100% certainty what an author meant to say. You can make assumptions and some can be more plausible than others and people can agree that one interpretation seems more valid than another but that's it. When a work of art is released into the world, the author has no authority over its meaning.
A good artist of course can make certain intentions very obvious and control, to a certain degree, what the recipient feels. That's what you're perceiving as missing in AI generated pictures.
Plastic arts is sculptures, three dimensional things like statues. Nothing to do with plastic, the material. It just so happens that 3D printing is a type of plastic art that uses types of plastic as its medium.
Exactly. I have no intention of selling my art and I object strongly to it being used by some company for their own profit. That's mine, wtf makes them think they can use it, regardless of its current monetisation status?
What difference does the medium make? The people who think AI pictures are good enough or even better than art made by humans will be perfectly fine with generating 3D models and printing them if they want any kind of sculpture.
I'm not a medical professional but based on what I've read (and experienced), I don't agree that it is. Both usually work best in tandem.