Nothing could be further from me than claiming we're being very original. Only 1 Pimmel would do that. I just thought your Pfosten might make people think there may be OTHER, very uniquely German reasons for this nonsense. Ü
My memory isn't what it was and it's been at least 100 years, back when Krautchan was good existent, but I do think Zangendeutsch came before we started enforcing it by declaring offenders Hurensöhne. If there are/were ever people who seriously wanted to ban English (and allow only German exclusively), they were a tiny minority and the point of Zangendeutsch went right over their head.
But how does that help? If I send past me a message, can past me change anything? What happens to the me that sent the message if past me receives it and changes stuff? Seems like you're creating a classic time travel paradox.
Even ignoring the internet's known tendencies, just having an AI generate a story that makes sense is a lottery. Having it translate its own nonsense and expect it to still make sense AND be suitable for language learning is fucking bonkers.
The question mark at the end of a sentence usually denotes a question. What you said seems to me to imply that we don't have any non-totalitarian countries because I don't see any that have these things as end goals (outside of empty promises from politicians).
For that matter, I don't even know what an "end goal" for a country would be. That's what I was trying to get at originally. Countries don't have end goals, beyond "stay existent".
What gimmick would that be? I can't see anything in the text that this might refer to. Is this a translation issue? Because even the term "DEI" is at least unusual, that's not a thing in Germany. I'd like to know what he said originally.
Bluesky themselves would love to discourage their users from calling them "skeets" but that train has left the station. If the hivemind picks a word, you have to roll with it.
Wehe, irgendwer plaudert, Jungs/Mädels/Diverse.