Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
4
Comments
116
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Sign the updates before uploading them so they can't be faked?

  • When a human recognizes patterns with meaning it's 'learning'. When an animal does it it's 'conditioning'

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • PEJMDAS. Juxtaposition is a distinct stage.

    Edit: This makes it consistent with

    x = 2 + 2y = 8 ÷ 2x

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • What does it mean by fruit? The entries thing or just the fleshy parts excluding the core?

  • Removed

    Which are you in?

    Jump
  • I was thinking I'd swap the faces too if I remembered to

  • Removed

    Which are you in?

    Jump
  • Remind me to post the reverse in june

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Do poeple really like blowjobs this much? Why are they always the punchline?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • What made you think I was proposing a scheme compliant with the bill? I repeatedly said that this would be to prevent such a bill from passing. And explained my reasoning why it would do so.

    To make it doubly clear: I don't support what they're trying to do. I just think it could do us good to ourselves address any legitimate concerns they use as excuses to implement surveillance so it's harder to use them as excuses.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • As far as I know self regulation by media industries implementing age labels prevented these kinds of "think of the children" bills before. No idea where you got the corporations having private information from, the entire idea is that it would be open source so we can know that it's not doing anything shady.

    Politicians pushing for these bills don't care about the excuse they present, but the reason they can repeatedly use the same excuse is because it is a legitimate concern for people. I don't think digging our heels in to refuse a solution even if it were to align with our stated principle of preserving privacy helps us in the public consciousness.

    even worse invasions of privacy

    "worse" isn't accurate as the entire point is that it would be designed to be non-invasive (for people who don't have csam anyways). Of course they'll keep trying to invade our privacy but with the example of a solution that doesn't use mass surveillance for something they tried to push surveillance for, they'll have less leg to stand on.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Can we take an 'industry regulates itself' approach to this? Make a foss csam hash scanner and include it in aosp. When they try to pass these show them that it already exists. That way we at least have some transparency to what it does

  • Pelican strikes back

  • Robust and easy to understand package/update manager?

    Honestly if it still has 2 gui package managers like when I last tried it that's not true neither.

  • Way over powered, and again this never happened before not even when gaming.

  • I'm pretty sure, at the very least it showed the boot crawl

  • Haven't opened the case in months

  • They're fine, cpu was probably below 65 C when it happened

  • That design looks AMAZING.

    Is there anything I need to know about the political affiliations of Jolla / past products / sailfish os before I pre-order this thing?

    Edit: nvm, no global shipping

  • Samsung Semiconductor: Buy these exynos chips and put them in your phonesSamsung Electronics: Ok buddy 😊

    Samsung Semiconductor: I lost money, raise your phone prices to make up for itSamsung Electronics: Of course! ✨️💫

    Samsung Electronics: I need ram to put in phones Samsung Semiconductor: lol no