Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L

Lightor

@ Lightor @lemmy.world

Posts
1
Comments
234
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Kristi Noem refuses to even look at photo of Abrego Garcia’s tattoos

    Jump

  • At some point there should be consequences for these people just not answering questions.

  • Hospital tells family brain-dead Georgia woman must carry fetus to birth because of abortion ban

    Jump

  • And they won't care at all after the kid is born. They are pro birth of factory workers, not pro life.

  • Trump loses his mind over pushback to Qatar jet deal

    Jump

  • But I waaaant it!

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene turns on Trump administration

    Jump

  • I mean, I don't even have to argue anymore. There are tons of ways, like looking at what foundations they fund, what legislation they pass around gun control, and such, but I don't even need them. If you're going to be overly general I can be pedantic. Their talk about gun control is different, you just admitted. Sounds like they're not EXACTLY the same huh?

  • ‘60 Minutes’ airs scathing segment on ‘first felon in the Oval Office’ despite pressure to avoid sensitive stories about Trump

    Jump

  • Yeah but you're upset about the country falling apart. They got what they wanted, they're "owning the libs" because we're "so mad about Trump winning." For a lot of them it's that simple, they just want to see people upset, it's fun to them.

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene turns on Trump administration

    Jump

  • Wow, how bad faith. I never said anything like that lol. You just have yourself all worked up and confused bud.

    But if you think they're so exactly the same I can point out some differences. One is their stance on gun control. I don't think they're EXACTLY the same on that topic. If you need to I can mention some more differences.

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene turns on Trump administration

    Jump

  • Never refuted that I made a mistake. I can say I did, I did. Doesn't bother me none, that was never the issue. It was you acting purposefully ignorant as a way to talk down to me. Take a step back, you proud about how you're handling yourself? You're not going to convince anyone of anything. If anything, people will have a bad taste on anything you say.

    Instead of staying in topic you decided to spril into hammering semantics. The only take away I can have is you're either a troll or this is all a deflection from the question. Either way, I don't care. You're a waste of time. I'll block you because I know you can't help butb reply. You're welcome lol.

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene turns on Trump administration

    Jump

  • Oh look, an assumption. Proving my point bud.

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene turns on Trump administration

    Jump

  • If you can't understand the core of that question without me spoon feeding it to you, you're not worth the time having a conversation with. You seem insufferable.

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene turns on Trump administration

    Jump

  • What a child

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene turns on Trump administration

    Jump

  • Like a child

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene turns on Trump administration

    Jump

  • Really avoided answering that question huh

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene turns on Trump administration

    Jump

  • Really? Where are all the signs, the flags, the people getting tattooed. People are calling Trump God, building him statues. If you look at the MAGA cult and say the other side is the same, turn you're detached from reality my guy.

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene turns on Trump administration

    Jump

  • I know you believe this, but this is why people don't take .ml people seriously lol

  • 'Do I Look Like I Care?': AOC Shreds Trump's Border Czar In Blunt Free Speech Reminder

    Jump

  • Why not exactly?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Ok

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Your point is to ignore that and blame the voters.

    Can you like, just not read? I said people should be represented.

    Let’s concede your point. Great. Voters are at fault and the party has no responsibility to represent them

    I never once said this. This is just you propping up this argument to avoid addressing any points I made. I said people who didn't vote did not take their opportunity to prevent this. That's just reality and facts my guy. If those upset you, I dunno what to say, you can try alternative facts, I hear republicans love those.

    Do you suppose the electorate is going to change? Do you suppose republicans are gonna come around?

    I dunno, but what I do know is you're not capable of having a conversation about those things. Why would I? You would just tell me how I feel and then insult me about it lol. You're not interested in a convo, you just want to mindlessly yell at someone without having to consider a new viewpoint at all. Just insult someone who disagrees, you sound like a republican for sure. And unable to address the actual topic, seems very republican too. Making up stuff I didn't say and using that in your argument, that seems very republican in nature. You must love where we're at huh? Everyone is acting like you.

    Listen, you're too emotional and caught up in yourself to have an actual conversation. You can't help but make wild assumptions, put words in my mouth, and run away with concepts I don't even agree with. You are part of the problem with the system. You ignore reality and just yell how you feel a lot, yell about how the ideal world should be, without being grounded in reality at all or even being willing to discuss it. You look at the world like a child, and argue like one too. Unable to address actual points, so you just make up stuff and rant about it. You don't need me for that; you seem more than capable of arguing with yourself.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • This is still deflecting from the issue I'm talking about. Everyone keeps bringing up what the DNC should have done differently, and you can make a long list of those things, but that is not my point.

    My point is, people had a choice, regardless of how they felt about the choices, they could choose Trump or Harris. A large portion of people didn't pick either one. Those people accepted that they were ok with either choice, because if they weren't, they would have prevented the outcome they thought was worse. That is my point. People could have impacted the outcome and chose not to. If they don't like how things are going now, good. They need to remember this next time and realize that voting for the least shitty of the two will at least prevent the worst case scenario. Taking a stance and not voting to send a message doesn't really do shit when the guy you let in office wants to remove term limits and get rid of checks and balances while ignoring the constitution. But hey, I guess at least they feel good about not voting for anything remotely bad as the world burns.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Why do I care? Because people who did nothing are trying to deflect the blame. People who didn't vote are just as responsible for the situation we're in and they need to understand that. They need to understand that not voting, especially due to a single issue, can have a very negative outcome.

    This isn't about you feeling represented, even though you should. That's the problem, people keep going back to that. They are two separate issues. Not being represented in the way you want doesn't remove your ability to vote for the best choice available.

    You can keep insulting me, assuming what I want, and making wild accusations about my political stance. It doesn't change the point and it makes you look like an immature, overly emotional person who can't have a reasonable conversation. Which seems to be the case.

    I've never told you to shut up.

    I've never talked about my political opinions, of anything I've eluded to not being happy with the situation.

    You're just making up things and throwing them at the wall because you don't like my opinion. But instead of engaging with the opinion and discussing it you'd rather play the victim while throwing insults.

    I say people can still vote and you respond with "easy for you to say." Yes, it is. Saying facts are easy. Try it. People could vote. They weren't locked in their homes. They had the ability to vote. How is this even a debate?

    If you want to have an actual conversation we can. If you just want to talk about me and make wild assumptions, there's no room for a convo.