Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
1
Comments
234
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • There is no room for a discussion. It's like one side saying "kill everyone" and the other side is saying "let's not kill people" then people are like "well, let's compromise and kill just some people, it's only fair." No, I'm done. Democrats have been way too tame and compromising for too long, I'm done entertaining this BS.

  • Saying they are "pro-genocide" is beyond hyperbolic.

    These type of extreme, over the top comments hurt way more than help.

  • Yes, the extremely subjective and biased findings look good. Which in science means nothing.

  • You don't know enough about the topic to argue but claim someone else is spreading misinformation.

    Well if you don't know the topic but are making claims like this then it seems like you may be the one spreading misinformation.

  • This study was essentially them asking cat owners information, no direct observation. This may be a surprise but people lie, especially when they really want something to work.

    No one is going to admit they hurt their cat by pushing a diet they believe is right.

  • Go back back to othering

    The irony...

  • You're really representing a lot of these with bad faith. It seems like you came into this thread with a view and used anything said to justify that view.

    Your first call out about and ignores the entire point being made and the clear double standard being called out. You seem more willing to play the victim than have an honest conversation on equality.

    Imagine if men behaved this way about women discussing double standards, it wouldn't make you feel good. So why do it to men?

  • Nah, this is textbook double standards.

    You are part of the problem that is stopping true equality. If men have everywhere to work through issues so you need a special place to do it, how does that end. You forever stay locked in that safe space because men own the public forum? Or do you try to fight for your spot in the public forum, attacking the only place you allowed men to work through issues? Or do you want a place in the public forum and your own space?

    So by your own logic women have their own communities and the general forum is for men, because of this post. So should women be told not to discuss their issues in general forums like Ask Lemmy and stick to their own communities? I mean these are for men right? Seems messed up to me.

    Why not just let everyone have a seat at every table? Be truly open and equal, instead of men deciding what women can have and women deciding what men can have. It's not a hard concept.

    It's people like you that make the divide bigger every time you fight for "equality".

  • It's the new block chain or NFT hype, they think it's magic.

  • What about their comment lacked critical thinking?

  • Is lemmy.ml turn into authoritarian?

    Jump
  • Dude, you're just as transparent as you are shallow.

  • I would love to and have tried. But I've found too many times that Firefox just doesn't work for some sites. And unfortunately some of those sites are needed for my work.

  • Wait, wait, wait, lemme get this right.

    Problem: They were low or revenue.

    Response: Increase API costs

    Problem: API costs are too high

    Response: People started scrapping Twitter

    Problem: People are scrapping the site

    Response: Make users sign in to view tweets

    Problem: People have to sign in to see any ads too

    Response: Tell companies that if they don't spend enough on ads they will lose verification.

    I mean, what's next?