Consider the implication to be some claim, for example, "When it's raining (A), it's wet (B)". The value of the implication tells us whether we should call the claimant a liar or. So in case it's raining (A = true) and is is not wet (B = false) the claim turns out to be false, so the value of the implication is false.
Now, supposing it is not raining (A = false). It doesn't matter whether it's wet or not, we can't call the claim false because there just isn't enough information.
It's about falsifiability (or lack thereof, in case A is never true).
I would investigate how on earth is it possible for a random dude from Czech Republic to become the president of the USA overnight. Sounds kinda problematic. I know the political system there is pretty fucked up but this is way beyond what I'd expect possible even by today's standards.
FFTFY: