I believe there are non surgical solutions to this? Though I do believe they are less effective, and you obviously may have already looked into it. Just thought I’d mention in case.
I’m pretty sure pi-hole has dns capabilities, as do alternatives like AdGuard home. Depending on your needs, staying with your current setup may be the most desirable option.
The names and addresses of people using T-Mobile? I’ve not dug into it, but there are definitely databases out there with phone number => provider, and plenty of databases with phone number => name and address. I assume there are multiple out there than combine them.
Are those lists complete? Absolutely not. But complete enough to send out a bunch of fake warnings to some randos.
… Yes. It’s obvious that’s how a stay works. The stay that the Supreme Court decided to give.
And no. If it hadn’t gone to the Supreme Court, or the Supreme Court had decided to not review it, ICE would not be allowed to racially profile.
Literally no one is saying the Supreme Court said it was legal. We are saying the Supreme Court allowed it.
The lower courts ruled against the Trump administration. The stay was to prevent that lower court ruling.
You’re splitting hairs on wording.
I’m done. You’re obviously arguing in bad faith here. Literally all news sources and legal reviews of the situation agree, meanwhile you’re being intentionally obtuse.
So, the part where they granted a stay… means nothing?
There didn’t need to be a injunction. The lower courts ruled it illegal. They were forced to stop. The Trump admin appealed, and the Supreme Court granted the Trump admin a stay until the appeal is heard. They were then allowed to continue.
Long story short, the Supreme Court allowed racial profiling to continue.
Why is this so difficult for you to understand? I’m genuinely confused on where your confusion is coming from.
Let me ask a question that might clear this up: Had the Supreme Court done literally nothing, would ICE be allowed to racially profile people?
I don’t know how else to explain to you that you are simply incorrect in this instance. Bottom line, the Supreme Court made a temporary ruling stating that ICE could continue to stop people based on racial profiling.
I’m sorry, what? Are you confused as to how things get to the Supreme Court? It’s here because of an appeal.
Lower courts said “yeah no, this shit is illegal, stop it” and the Supreme Court said “well we are going to look at this, so you can keep doing things the way you were until we do.”
The Supreme Court could also have said “well, we are going to look at this, so you have to stop until we do.”
Using your logic, they shouldn’t be doing it because a lower court ruled it illegal.
So you’re saying there’s a chance!