Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
1092
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • do we really need a justification to get together and have fun?; or to have a day off and do fuck all? for those that rather do that instead?; or anything in between?

  • Like people that try to nullify an argument against cars by saying "well you have a car so you are a hypocrite"... we may all be forced to own a car but that does not preclude anyone from understanding what's negative about cars or cities designed for driving

  • Now when I mean set it back in the right direction I don’t mean back to the far left either

    that has literally never been the case for the usa

  • tell her to remember that as she ages and her "value" declines

  • Nicki was supposed to be this amazing female rapper and then sold out for garbage pop music... now she sells out for the orange pedo... I get a feeling she'd sell anything out for a paycheck

  • I think the purpose of these has went over a lot of people’s head.

    maybe read the article… you would have noticed this:

    It spells out in the patent that "the shape of the engagement recesses prevents the screw from being loosened or tightened using common counter-drive structures, e.g. by unauthorized persons." That's straight from BMW.

    The idea is to use it for places where fasteners are normally visible. Seat mounting places, for example. Or other parts like connecting "the cockpit to the load-bearing body structure."

  • Don't worry, I am sure they are super happy their favorite orange pedophile is having a Ball room built... they'll be warmed and nourished by the notion

  • what do you want us to do? go out and start killing people because they’re corrupt pieces of shit?

    Maybe start with a General Strike... or at the very least one of those No King parades but on a Monday

  • I did for my phone but can't get Teams to share screen on my desktop (Linux desktop) while Chromium can... once I have that one figured out, I will switch to Waterfox on the desktop as well

  • not quite like this… the original form was not a total kill switch, it was a vague "you are in control" (of this thing you didn't ask for but we are activating for you by default)

  • not quite like this… the original form was not a total kill switch, it was a vague "you are in control" (of this thing you didn't ask for but we are activating for you by default)

  • pointing something out is not shitting on them

  • don't worry… they also believe in ultimate personal responsibility

  • clearly some damage control strategy here… but good news if true

  • what a petty, little bitch

  • You think people aren’t going to want to use AI unless it does literally everything for them? That’s exactly the “if something’s not perfect then it must be awful” mindset I was criticizing in the comment you’re responding to.

    NOT AT ALL... I am simply claiming AI is NOT living nearly close to the expectations the peddlers have raised. I'm not saying if it's not perfect it must be bad, I am saying it is disappointing

    I don’t see a link to that research, but that means 38% don’t believe AI is significantly overhyped.

    Not even close again... if I can prove I did not kill the Sheriff, this is not prove I did not kill the deputy. Maybe ALL of that 38% think AI is just over hyped (not significantly)

    You are now arguing that the source that you yourself brought into this discussion is no good.

    Again no, my source was there simply to state AI projects are failing left, right and center and I have made very clear that I am speculating from that (and my own experience) that tech savvy people do not like AI

    See, I cannot hide a project that failed spectacularly... but I can smile nervously in my boss' office telling the reporter I, in no way, blame the shit tech that he forced us to use.

  • So we’ve moved from “no tech-savvy people use AI!” to “lots of tech-savvy people use AI, but many of them fail to make it profitable!”

    No, we are trying to tease out if "tech savvy people" use AI at gun point or not because if it is at gun point, it disarms your argument

    The Commerce Institute puts that 95% figure in perspective, about 65.3% of all businesses fail by their tenth year. That’s not focusing just on a particular industry that’s the most unknown and volatile one, that’s everything, including fields that have been well known and understood for decades. And I should also note, your source said 95% had yet to grow their revenue, not that 95% had failed - it’s only been a year or two for most.

    These are not new business (not all at least, these are already viable businesses trying to reap the promises of AI and failing miserably. You can interpret however you want but I interpret that as "most of these business bought the snake oil and it did not cure their hiccups"

    Wow, only 30% of office tasks can be handled by AI? Clearly a useless technology, throw it away.

    Again, what is the expectation being sold out there? 30 % increase in preformance? or "we WOn'T nEEd progRAmMers iN 3 yEars"?

    So, half of them haven’t abandoned those plans.

    Meaning what? sunk cost fallacy? deeper pockets to hold on and see if they can fix it? deeper pockets and being able to hide the huge mistake this was? I can speculate in the opposite direction you are, just as easily

    I don’t see a link to that research, but that means 38% don’t believe AI is significantly overhyped.

    If my job depends on saying you are correct... Mr. FaceDeer you are always correct, the most correct ever.

    This ties to my previous comment that we need to find unbiased sources and that would include people that use AI because they want to, not because their livelihood depends on it

    Basically, you’re falling into the trap of assuming if something’s not perfect and not universally loved then it must be awful

    Not even close... what I am seeing is that AI peddlers promised elephants but they are delivering something that looks like a large dog with no cool trunk

  • the keyword word you missed was "unbiased"

    of course the AI peddlers will peddle it and their employees would probably be fired if they did not toe the company line

    on the otheer hand, that mit studyshowed 95v of them failed… I find it hard to believe people enjoy failing

  • I don't disagree with using unbiased data, but where is yours?

  • time for one final, multi million dollar bonus for the CEO that brought it there