Ive had this argument with people multiple times and it ALWAYS boils down to, Steam is too successful and no one else wants to compete with what steam is actually doing right.
Because that's what is it's been called for generations. How the hell do you not know this before commenting? Are you one of those piece of shit Americans who thinks everything needs to be done the way you expect it?
Dont go with the least crazy, they may be just competent enough to be a spectacular sycophant, you want someone who clearly IS crazy, but just enough that when the general election happens they look that much worse
I'm.confused. please help me understand. You say they can just alter stuff to win I'm sure a law firm with enough money can add still make a case and I have some ideas on how that would work.
I thought this is what Discovery is for. But IANAL
However, I might be willing to give you a small interest free loan to get as much evidence, tampered or not from them. If you win millions I would really like a modest apartment each for me and my brother. Send me a DM if interested. I don't have much but I would love to contribute to anything that may help you and everyone else have at least waste Amazon's time in court, and also just for the record show that people have to continually fight for their rights if they work for Amazon. The more cases against them, win or fail, the more there is on the record, and evidence already used in a court available for everyone else to utilize. And it's only a matter of time before they get caught manipulating evidence, if you don't win now, you may be able to reopen the case in 20 years when new practices to detect altered documents exists.
This is long term planning, and if it's only a cost that is keeping you from dragging them to court for your rights then I would love to help pull these fuckers down. I don't care if it's a rediculously small chance to do real consequences to Amazon now or in 20 years. That's how you fight immortal Jotun, over time or just get lucky
I don't follow where you are going with this. The premise is Google recording images and having a naked child in them, which is no different than named children appearing in movies without it being CP... Somehow.
And what your response to my comment doesn't seem to address or explain is why those movies got to be allowed when they have naked children in them. At least it's not obvious
So what is it that makes recording naked kids permissible and what doesn't.
Google doesn't make movies doesn't answer or explain anything that I can figure out
This sounds great. Doesn't ever seem to work in my dating bios. I'm really not cut out to meet people. I'm delightful in person, usually, anyone wanna set me up on a blind date or 10?
PS Match™ group dating sites are all trash in my terrible experience ;(
Iirc child nudity isn't enough for something to be considered porn. It has to be gratuitous. Not sure if that is the same for transmitting online or not.
It's fakin weird by today's standards though and is probably handled very differently from one place to another
Ive had this argument with people multiple times and it ALWAYS boils down to, Steam is too successful and no one else wants to compete with what steam is actually doing right.