Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G

General_Effort

@ General_Effort @lemmy.world

Posts
92
Comments
1014
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • That pitch is not gonna work here. The local hive mind already believes that knowledge is a proprietary asset.

  • The Wifi God Demands it

    Jump

  • My boss never gets me a hamster when I'm down.

  • LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

    Jump

  • Probably not.

    I don't know what AI companies you mean here. From context, I'm guessing that you don't mean the likes of Anthropic, but rather companies that do sleuthing on the net, like those firms that look for copyright or trademark violations. I'm not familiar with that industry and don't know their marketing material. Maybe that's the problem.

    I don't know what claims they make, or how it relates to the Epstein files, or OP.

  • LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

    Jump

  • I doubt a reputable company would do that, except in cooperation with the authorities. Some people have used AI in an attempt to do that, but I'm not familiar with the details.

    I don't really understand what you expect from who and why.

  • LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

    Jump

  • But as it stands right now we just know that it’s not being used to do what they claim.

    Wait. How do we know this? Besides, these researchers show that it is possible, not that it is established practice.

  • Nearly Half of Europeans Want X Banned if it Continues to Break the Law

    Jump

  • What I'm getting at is that these laws demand that companies should do the spying. Surveillance is expensive, so foisting on these foreign companies is politically the easiest solution.

  • LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

    Jump

  • I still can't make sense of what you are trying to say.

  • WTF, a banana is a berry!!?

    Jump

  • I didn't know plants have ovaries. Does that mean that strawberries are like an afterbirth? Are seedless fruit menstrual flow?

    Maybe humans could evolve so that the bloody placenta attracts wolves who then raise the baby.

  • LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

    Jump

  • You said: I’m suggesting that AI can’t do what is claimed or that people with something to prove are not interested in proving something.

    You're also saying: My statement was that AI can be used unmask the individuals that have been redacted. AKA they are anonymized. This paper is all about de-anonomyzing.

    I can't make sense of what you are trying to say.

  • Nearly Half of Europeans Want X Banned if it Continues to Break the Law

    Jump

  • I can tell, you don't understand what's going on and that's scary. Unfortunately, it would still be scary if you did. But at least you would be able to have a positive effect on the world for the better.

  • LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

    Jump

  • How so?

  • Nearly Half of Europeans Want X Banned if it Continues to Break the Law

    Jump

  • I see. I have some doubts about the motivation of these people, too. But regulators are going after X.

    Consider that the chatcontrol equivalent would be going after services that don't spy enough on their users.

  • LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

    Jump

  • You think the paper is fraud?

  • Nearly Half of Europeans Want X Banned if it Continues to Break the Law

    Jump

  • Yeah. I understand what you mean. That is simply not true. Ok, teachable moment.

    In Germany, that slogan is considered a Hamas slogan. Hamas has been classified as an extremist organization. That means that using its slogans and symbols is illegal under the same laws that make Nazi slogans and symbols illegal. That's the hate speech and illegal content that online platforms are supposed to remove.

    Failing to crack down on hate speech is one of the biggest complaints against X. If you demand that authorities to enforce EU platform laws harder, then what happens is that this slogan is suppressed harder. You understand?

  • LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

    Jump

  • Prompts are in the appendix: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16800

    I don't know how far you get on the free tier but it should be at least enough for a proof of principle; to get other people to chip in. You didn't have qualms demanding other people should do this for free.

    Mind that this is a serious GDPR violation in Europe. So there will be serious pressure on AI companies to prevent this kind of use.

  • Nearly Half of Europeans Want X Banned if it Continues to Break the Law

    Jump

  • And how does that work legally?

  • Nearly Half of Europeans Want X Banned if it Continues to Break the Law

    Jump

  • I think you are just not making any sense.

  • LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

    Jump

  • Hmm. Maybe but it is not the same problem as those discussed in OP. I also have some doubts about the paper, but that's another story. You could try it out?

  • Nearly Half of Europeans Want X Banned if it Continues to Break the Law

    Jump

  • Uh. So... Prosecuting bad. Not prosecuting those who do not cooperate with the prosecutors also bad because hypocrisy.