Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
Posts
2
Comments
1231
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • They shelved it because it didn't work. I have a very normal English accent (think BBC) and the voice recognition was extremely unreliable. Super frustrating experience. Plus nobody wants to use a voice interface in public.

    I dunno if we ever really saw how the "camera on your head" social aspect would have played out because they were too shit for anyone except the curious rich to buy them in the first place.

    This thing seems to work (well in theory anyway) without a voice interface which is much saner.

  • Yeah but that's mostly network effects and free CI, which must cost them a ton of money. I'd be surprised if they're even profitable just because of that. I mean it's worth it for Microsoft clearly, but if they ever decide it isn't and turn the screws, there are at least two good alternatives - Gitlab and Codeberg.

    I would also jump ship immediately if there was a platform that properly handled stacked PRs. I literally just want to be able to say "this PR includes this other PR - don't show that one". Is that too much to ask?

  • I support the idea but is it really that important? It's just a name. Call it ECMAScript if you're worried. JavaScript if you aren't.

  • Windows 11 IoT LTSC is very good. I don't know about the normal consumer version.

  • Not exactly. It is pretty similar though, true.

  • Yeah it's obviously an improvement but I guess you can't really sell a distro on "it has a more logical filesystem layout which may cause some issues, and it's super super niche which will definitely cause some issues".

    Probably a lost cause. I imagine Flatpak will actually work properly before the Unix filesystem hierarchy is made sane.

  • Ha-Ha -exactly

  • Yeah it was inspired by Powershell. But it also has syntax that isn't completely awful.

  • No. Closest is probably Zed but it's still way way off from being a serious VSCode competitor. For example it has no settings GUI at all; just a JSON file. It can't edit large files. Font rendering is still hit and miss.

    Ask again in 5 years...

  • How "production" are we talking? Pretty bad idea if it's an important work server. "Sorry boss, nobody could connect today because VSCode's mojam.service hit one of its many many 100% CPU bugs".

    I think in theory there's no reason it isn't technically possible, but I doubt it's set up to allow it because that's a pretty odd thing to want to do.

    Edit: oh you want to access it via Android. That makes vaguely more sense.

  • Bad code will be unreadable in any language of course.

    Yeah I'm talking about good code, or at least not bad code. Let's not "no true Scotsman" this.

    Even for good code you don't need syntax highlighting to easily see which identifiers are function names and which are their parameters in Rust.

  • Rust. It has all the good bits of functional programming but basically none of the bad bits.

    Good bits:

    • Strong type system (though not quite as sophisticated as Haskell or OCaml).
    • Map, filter, etc.
    • First class functions (though lifetimes can make this a bit awkward)
    • Everything is an expression (well most things anyway).

    Bad bits:

    • "Point free style" and currying. IMO this is really elegant, but also makes code difficult to read very quickly. Not worth the trade-off IMO.
    • No brackets/commas on function calls. Again this feels really elegant but in practice it really hurts readability.
    • Global type inference. Rust requires explicit types on globals which is much much nicer.
    • Custom operators. Again this is clever but unreadable.
    • Small communities.
    • Poor windows support (not a fundamental thing but it does seem to be an issue in practice for lots of functional languages).
  • Clearly within the margin of error. Especially because they were obviously not just looking at Bulgaria.

  • Not sure what you "security" link has to do with anything, but Windows has had a pretty great security record for the past decade at least. Arguably better than Linux and at least on par. They do things like static analysis of drivers which as far as I know Linux doesn't require.

    There are still a lot of vulnerabilities, but don't try to disprove this with a link to some CVE because there are also a ton of Linux vulnerabilities.

    Also Microsoft doesn't take the dubious view that security bugs are "just bugs" and don't deserve special consideration.

  • Not for normal people.

  • Your tedious query if I had filed a bug report.

  • complaining in a random forum would change anything.

    What gave you the impression that I thought it would?

  • Right but presumably they chose the names?

    So did you file a bug report

    It's not a requirement to file a bug report before you comment on anything. Don't be silly.