Yes, and how nice it is, and how ckean it is, and how littke their csr breaks down and how sparkly and well maintained or their workplsce is, or how brilliant their job is despite being an "average, underdog hero"
This is precisely what i was thinking of when i made this post!
I've known people who do put-on the "romcom/sitcom protsgonist persona" which you describe - overly bubbly, intonating words wrong, corporate speak - and long story short, they're always untrustworthy.
Yep heard of this one! It's pretty f-ed up that people are going out looking for fights thinking that thwre's no harm in them or themselves getting a concussion
Yes, also hollywood portrays friends and family as cussing each other off and being really pissy with each other because "nothing mean that we say is lasting or counts as an insult because we already have emotional invulnerability to one another" - it is not like this AT ALL in real life. The people who can hurt you most are the ones closest to you, and i think that this is an example where real life has been imitating the art too much - people are much more emotionally abusive of one another than before, taking banter much too far.
There's probably no way for me to prove to you that it makes sense to me, unless you learn how to make sense of it yourself. I mentioned "which" and "they" because, as an english speaker knowing context about cats and rats, i can infer what connective could go there, but i don't need it because without the connectives we get a more colloquial informal way of saying it all.
Is english your first language or is something else ?
The washington cats 2. Which florida rats chase 3. They annoy vegas whores
It's a question of where you put pauses and intonation, when sounding it out in your head (or to another person). If you read it monotone it makes little sense. Unfortunately, knowing how its said requires deciphering it first. A lot of english novels have stuff like this, you'll probably find - you have to read sentences twice to understand what it means
Not an essential word if you the listener have context! It's just that understanding this phrase is reliant on reader knowing context (i..e either that buffalo tend to buffalo buffalo OR just the theory/gimmick of the sentence itself.)
Also i believe OP made some effort to indicate via Capitalisation that one repeated buffalo is a proper noun. (Place name)
Yes and i think this would be a healthy thing to show.