Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
Posts
0
Comments
645
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Fair. I just think is prudent to draw a line between natural difficulty and cultural resistance to change.

  • They're historically relatable because they're based on author's life. The author's life currently happens to be living in a country where one constantly worries about these topics.

  • Moreover, codebase in pure funcional languages is hard to understand and maintain, that’s why they are rarely used in production.

    This is incorrect. They are rarely used because procedural languages have momentum. It's way more likely you'll get Joe Codemonkey to learn and be productive quickly with functional features added to a procedural language than to learn and be productive quickly with an entirely different paradigm. So that's what happens.

  • My systems work fine how they are and I've used Linux for years without ever encountering the issues they claim to solve.

  • Look friend. I'm not trying to be confrontational like you think. Your original post legimately comes off as an unhinged rant and makes no fucking sense. TBH I assumed you were drunk off your ass when you posted it.

    You don't have to listen to me, obviously, but you should probably take the universal downvotes on what I suspect would be a popular opinion if it actually made sense as a sign that... Your post didn't make any sense.

  • Lol if you think that was anything other than an unintelligible rant you need to take a step back and read it again

  • Uhhh you ok?

  • Bet it'll be grok

  • How is this relevant

  • What anticompetitive practices? This normally refers to things like selling at a loss long enough to destroy fledgling competition and the like. As far as I'm aware, steam just... provides good services that other stores don't?

  • Lol that's not a false equivalency. You don't get to just decide words mean things they don't because it sounds nice in your head.

  • If you're so sensitive to being corrected the easy way to avoid it is to simply not create misinformation in the first place.

  • Yeah probably lol

  • EZ. Your original totally incorrect comment that you're trying to pretend didn't mean what it obviously meant.

    You’d have to design hardware specifically that’s compatible with Linux

    You don't have to design hardware you have to write drivers.

    It's OK to admit you're wrong.

  • You're just embarrassing yourself at this point.

  • The cool thing is that since it is correct there is no barrier to vanilla wine using it, and stuff running well in vanilla wine instead of requiring proton's hijinks is cool.

  • The only thing that is lacking for compatibility is drivers. If that's what you meant you should have said so instead of saying hardware needs to be designed. If that's not what you meant then you don't know what you're talking about.

  • You’d have to design hardware specifically that’s compatible with Linux

    What makes you think that?

  • I wouldn't assume that Java is only half as fast as C for every workload. It's probably a lot closer than you think in a lot of real world scenarios.