They are so much better than using a search engine to parse web forums and stack overflow,
The hallucinations (more accurately bullshitting) and the fact they have to get new training data but are discouraging people from engaging in the structures that do so make this highly debatable
Abortion rights (and everything else that was a constant campaign point for both the rs and ds) were hanging by a thread on supreme court decisions for years and years. They had decades to actually legislate them.
Touche, though passing a constitutional amendment as the method is a pipe dream, and you'll have to forgive me for not really believing they mean it given how many of them are completely governed by special interests.
They don't get credit for something they did 15 years ago and have completely backed off on.
Ok why didn't that do that when they controlled the house? Oh yeah because it's something they only do to drive engagement and never act on when they can.
Show me in their platform where it says they still support that. Show me any recent serious party wide efforts. Show me in kamala harris' 2024 platform.
You don't have to pass constitutional amendments to pass laws. They could introduce bills even if they don't pass and campaign on them.
They do the bare minimum to trick people like you into thinking they give a single fuck about you. I'm sorry, but that don't. The Democrat party is owned by wealthy interests that unlike the Republicans are smart enough to give the working class enough crumbs to keep society from collapsing, but that's not enough to energize people to vote anymore because life just keeps getting harder and harder for the average American even when they're in charge.
All that isn't to say that people shouldn't vote for a corporate dem when it's that or a republican, but you're completely blind if you can't see that there are real problems with the party that are contributing to their losses.
They propose removing money from politics, taxing the rich, paying for everybody’s healthcare including dental, and enshrining bodily autonomy rights in law.
some of them propose some of that some of the time.
Removing money from politics is not a party goal.
The party was never behind m4a, just some individuals
they've never attempted to enshrine bodily autonomy rights in law even when they were in power. They just campaign on it then forget as soon as the election ends.
Even that description is vastly overselling it's usefulness. Every time someone says it's like a junior dev I just sigh, because literally the only reason I like junior devs is because they turn into not junior devs. Never once has assigning something to a junior dev made my job easier. The entire goal is to train them to the point they make PRs that I don't have to walk them through reworking.
It remains to be seen whether the advent of “agentic AIs,” designed to autonomously execute a series of tasks, will change the situation.
“Agentic AI is already reshaping the enterprise, and only those that move decisively — redesigning their architecture, teams, and ways of working — will unlock its full value,” the report reads.
"Devs are slower with and don't trust LLM based tools. Surely, letting these tools off the leash will somehow manifest their value instead of exacerbating their problems."
Sure. But a serious negotiation doesn't involve giving up civil rights or empowering the path to fascism. Somehow I don't think Chuck shares my opinion there
What never ceases to amaze me is that people hiring undocumented workers aren't getting in major legal trouble, and that they straight up admit they were doing it publicly.
Assuming the mindset that we need to get rid of the big scary immigrants, how are the people hiring them not equally culpable?
The hallucinations (more accurately bullshitting) and the fact they have to get new training data but are discouraging people from engaging in the structures that do so make this highly debatable