Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
0
Comments
1290
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • What, you women have never met a straight man before!? We honk each others' dongs all the time! It's called being interested in your friends!!!

  • Sorry, some of us did what we could...

  • Eh. They shared those features to Notepad, so I would agree that they're a part of it.

  • “My silence is because what I really think is not in the mainstream,” Scaramucci replied. “And so what I really think, if I end up saying it on our podcast, people will say, OK, I’m being absurd. OK, so—but I think there’s a hold on him.”

    Fuck you. You were complicit. For 1 mooch, but still. You saw all this shit and you still agreed to be part of the administration. Even now, you'll hint at it but not say everything. Your comments against Trump now mirror other rich Republican assholes who only speak up after the fact, when they can no longer benefit from his cult-like base.

  • An unelected Nazi loser. Congress would love to demand questions of him but republicans are blocking that. For now...

  • I wish the pillow was me!

  • How dare you. We also like salty and "cheese".

  • Removed

    Just Because

    Jump
  • Actually, it's now called the Canaderse.

  • If they chose to do it because they want to, how is that "demeaning"?

  • I guess I should have expected it, but I was hoping they were videos on how to do crime... ☹️

  • I'm confused. I thought we were talking about the internet, not the sound your mom makes?

  • Weird, every researcher seems to use this same term.

    So go pound sand with that 'facts' horseshit.

    Oh, those pesky """"facts""""! You don't like my sources, that's fine. I included 8 more in my other comment, starting with Wikipedia:

    https://feddit.nl/comment/15554133

  • Sorry, I misunderstood. So many people are having an emotional reaction to my comments...

  • EDIT: Sorry, my fault! I thought you were arguing against the evidence, like many here...

    Facts & science, please. I swear, I'm really not trying to be a jerk, but you make several assertions without proof. You're saying I don't have the full picture. But also implying we're seeing so many news stories about pits attacking children, data about than being more dangerous because... there's fewer of them? Legitimately not trying to strawman you or put words in your mouth, but that would be exactly opposite the point you're trying to defend.

  • Thank you. This was so obviously my point...

  • No one said it was a slam dunk? If you won't accept statistics by non-profit organizations trying to provide people with knowledge, facts, and legal info... What would convince you that any one breed of dog is more dangerous than others?