Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
7
Comments
639
Joined
2 yr. ago

Refugee from another, less-friendly instance. Please forgive the youth of my account— I’ve actually been around here for a while. Still, glad to be here!

  • Once again, I am not responsible for your inability to accept reality.

  • I pity you for how much you are struggling to accept this.

    I’ve already explained it, and you chose to ignore that. Again, not my fault or responsibility, but yours.

    I wish you all the best luck in your struggles.

  • At least you were able to admit that you’re mistaken. But blaming others for your own unwillingness/inability to accept facts is irrational.

  • I am not beholden to your standards. It’s a simple fact, which I explained clearly, and you are obviously struggling to accept that fact.

    That is not my responsibility, nor is my problem.

  • No. But you’re clearly

    Sealioning

    Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassmentthat consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity ("I'm just trying to have a debate"), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.[1][2][3][4] It may take the form of "incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate",[5]and has been likened to a  denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings.[6] The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomicWondermark by David Malki,[7] which The Independent called "the most apt description of Twitter you'll ever see".[8]

  • You’re looking for logic in human linguistics. That is your mistake.

    It is what it is, and it’s simply for you to either accept or have a lack of acceptance. But that’s what wetness is, regardless of your counter arguments.

    If you can’t accept that, that’s your problem. It doesn’t change the nature of wetness.

    This is why I don’t argue with flat earthers or holocaust deniers. People like you can’t be reasoned with.

  • To repeat: I already gave a well-defined reason in my initial comment. It’s your choice whether or not to accept it.

    I suppose being overly contrarian and argumentative might entertain you, but I’m not going to indulge such childishness (or, perhaps, ignorance) further.

  • The explanation was in the original comment. I simply clarified due to your misunderstanding.

    Look, this is a mix of both logic and linguistics (which isn’t always logical). Even if it doesn’t make sense to you, this is how it is. I suggest that you accept it, however, if you refuse to accept it, the next logical course of action would be to invent a new word which describes liquids touching liquids. Most would call it “a mixture“, but people like you are often unsatisfied with anything you don’t make up yourselves.

    I look forward to hearing what new word you may come up with.

  • Lmao

  • Wetness is not a property which can be applied to a liquid— only a solid which has come in contact with liquid.

    Adding liquid to liquid just makes more liquid, not “wet” liquid.

    Now, I suppose there could be rare exceptions to this— if an especially viscous liquid were able to produce a surface upon which another, less viscous liquid might make contact with, then that would result in “the surface of X liquid is wetted by Y liquid”— but, even then, the property of wetness only applies to the semi-solid/liquid surface (a property similar to a solid), and not because they, say, mixed. Mixed liquid just form new liquids, compounds, etc. not “wet” ones.

  • Water is, in fact, not wet. Like any liquid, it can only make wet what it touches/soaks. Wetness is a property bestowed upon other things (primarily solid objects) which come into contact with a liquid, but not the liquid itself.

    And, no, adding water to water doesn’t result in “wet” water— just more water.

  • In Orlando. It’s was extremely windy and rainy all last night and into this morning, but then it cleared up pretty quick. I didn’t lose services, but lots of others did. There’s debris everywhere from trees and whatnot.

    I sheltered at my mom’s condo to keep her company. I’m just glad it wasn’t worse for us.

  • Thanks, Geordi

  • Oh, I remember that! It was inside the little packet