Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
6
Comments
469
Joined
1 yr. ago

Boycott list for mod abuse and power trips: lemmy.ml, blahaj.zone, lemmy.zip | Warning list: lemmy.ca

  • You might get something out of it from a thinking model (you probably shouldn't try with a regular one), but don't trust it 100%

  • I believe windscribe also has a nice free plan

  • VPN companies have a low interest in selling user data. Their business model is pretty profitable already, and any leak of this would instantly kill the brand.

    There's no reason for proton and mullvad to sell user data. They would be legally liable and they would break their profitable companies

    It’s like 23andme

    fucking DNA stuff that was even written in the privacy policy iirc so meh, not the same

    simply selling out eventually like they all do

    would love to get examples of this. I have a lot of counter examples

  • they're good at protecting websites but damn, having a company being MITM feels so wrong

  • I assume their script does some search engine stuff like query google or bing and then "scrap" the links they go on

    Some selenium stuff

  • They do have a point though. It would be great to let per-prompt searches go through, but not mass scrapping

    I believe a lot of websites don't want both though

  • I don't like cloudflare but it's nice that they allow people to stop AI scrapping if they want to

  • woops, you're completely right. Got fucked by an LLM. I thought I had checked but it seems like I only did for mastodon and trusted it for the rest

    Mailcow seems to be on GPL, not AGPL as well

    My bad. I was searching for examples but that's still bad

  • the devil you don’t

    You're saying the reputable company is a devil we don't know? If you want to be dishonest, try a bit harder.

    What you should say is "What's better? The devil you know or the unknown entity that claims to be an angel (and that hasn't been caught doing bad things since its existence, a few years)?"

  • That’s for deployed services that others are using.

    What I meant to say is that it's a public mastodon, gitea, mailcow instance

    then talk to a lawyer who specializes in copyright for your jurisdiction

    It would be a nice answer, but I'm not going to if I'm not going to make money with the projects. I can't justify this spending

  • is ProtonVPN a scam then? no.

    Most are, but not necessarily

  • better than having a company that is directly known as watching you and sending all of it to your government

    some companies have built a strong reputation

  • In all cases, copyright generally only applies to distribution. If you do not distribute any code or software, you are most likely fine.

    With AGPL, if people use the derivative work over the web, you have to provide the source and document the modifications that were made

  • Why would it with GPL? AGPL is GPL with an added clause

  • If I create a script that interacts with the API it’s not considered a part of the software then?

  • I hope this fits here

  • Yes

  • This one is great and asks you to contact members of the European Parliament

  • change.org doesn't do shit and it's bad for privacy and anonymity