Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
6
Comments
469
Joined
1 yr. ago

Boycott list for mod abuse and power trips: lemmy.ml, blahaj.zone, lemmy.zip | Warning list: lemmy.ca

  • Uses a tool the bad way despite it being public knowledge that it's bad for mental health

    Was predisposed to mental health problems

    Died, partly because they talked to a chatbot

    "It's the chatbot's, creator fault", despite the chatbot never being made to cause those problems, and efforts being made to fix those problems

    ...

    Yea nah, it's just anti-ai people doing their thing again and not being objective.

    Get a better fight, such as hating on pharmaceutical laboratories companies pushing the use of extremely addictive substances for profit, despite them knowing the immense risk they cause to consumers, and financing false ads to make it safe.

    If Sam Altman belongs in prison, it would either be:

    • Because he's destroying the planet (ecologically)
    • Because he stole lots of content to train his models
  • I mean, I see this as a consequence of all these articles about people using ChatGPT for harmful things

  • You can, but no one will use it because you won't have Android apps on it. The lock in is real

  • You got me in the first part

    I hope this is sarcasm though

  • that's mansplaining /s

  • So you prefer defaming people just in case? I'm sorry but that's dumb.

    At this point most people explaining things to others, assuming they're not knowledgeable, can be called racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic...

    I feel like falsely calling out someone makes you a bigger asshole than someone thinking they're smarter. In a way, you think you're smarter and believe they only say these things because they're discriminating.

  • Both exist and are a problem.

  • Funnily enough, assuming men are likely to be sexist is sexist

  • through the assumption that you, a man, knows better than her

    And what's the evidence that this happened here? You just assumed he was sexist.

  • The definition says the opposite. But even if it was the case, it should NOT be used like this becaue it is specifically targeting men, which would be sexist. Being the very thing it meant to destroy.

  • Violent and strict feminists are probably feminist if they seek equality. I don't think it's a good position to be in, but that's it

    There is a popular trend of "all men", or "the world would be better without men", this is not feminism, and that's the definition of "extreme feminism" for me. Misandry is extreme feminism. These people can go fuck themselves. They're enemies of feminism.

    Hating others is easy. There's a lot of xenophoby, homophoby, transphoby, sexism. We don't need more hate from the marginalized people themselves.

    I hope what you're saying is not true. I've seen things that make me think it could be, but I still hope must people aren't morons.

  • When were you defending me?

    Just by upvoting, I meant

    Is extreme feminism not considered feminism in your mind?

    No. Feminism is wanting to reach equality and stop discrimination between sex/genders, which I’m all for. Extreme feminism is wanting women superiority, or attacking men to improve women's situation

  • I was defending you then but I can’t anymore. No, it’s not because feminism boosts it, it’s because extreme feminists (the real feminazis) and misandrists love to abuse this word

    Feminism is good, but generalizing men or accusing of sexism without evidence is dumb sexism

    Just like accusing of racism without evidence. It’s defamation

  • oh, I didn't know this

  • uh, not sure, I'm in Europe as well

    I was thinking about NFC payments, yea

  • Nice timing for chat control!

  • Google pay is being shut down?

    Seems like Curve pay could be an alternative