Skip Navigation

Posts
18
Comments
692
Joined
3 yr. ago

🇨🇦

  • HR departments get flooded with AI generated applications by the truckload making automating rejections the only viable way to keep up

    That goes both ways. Employers have been auto rejecting applicants for years, so applicants have shifted to automating applications.

    Why should someone looking for a job take the time to craft an application, when it gets rejected without a person ever actually looking at it.


    Last time I went job hunting (2yrs ago), I got a response from less than 1% of the jobs I applied to.

  • Gasoline will do the same.

  • Molotov's are pretty cheap/easy to make and they're pretty effective during construction, before the sprinkler system is installed+charged.

  • 'Hey Mr.President sir, Can you sign this law that would let me sue you? Thanks.'

    Good luck with that one. I like the thought, but yeah, not gonna happen. At least making them say no is a statement I guess.

  • Mix it up a bit; just play dialup tones.

  • I guess it automatically locallizes the price. Shows me 23.99CAD.

    Doesn't show me a captcha either.

  • Nobody wants to see that pussy anyway.

    Also; his neck looks like a vagina.

  • I don't see why not, and for $24 you may as well give it a go.

  • Schools are the obvious places to test/enact these types of changes too.

    Kids don't know to speak out against remote policing via robotics, and normalising it now gets them used to it's wider use in society later.

    It's much easier to raise a generation under a new set of standards, than it is to make an existing generation accept a new normal.

  • Drones are an effective tool on an open battle field; but they operate under wildly different conditions. Wide open spaces and short contacts (find target, ram to explode. They don't have to loiter and maintain that contact).

    A pepper spray equipped drone in a school??? Tight enclosed spaces with halls and doorways (that are usually closed) you've got to navigate. Quad copters are loud, and that'd be amplified by that enclosed space. Without sufficient distance to keep out of reach they'd be an easy target to take down by the assailant. To use the spray, you'd have to get near, deploy it, and escape before being struck down; giving the spray to the assailant to harvest and use.

    AND they've only got 8min of flight time.

  • the keys are stored on the TPM and can't be exported

    Makes sense; if you can export them, so can an adversary.

    now the adversary demands access to your backups

    Only if they know/think they exist. The idea here would have been to make a nondescript offline backup of the keys and keep them totally seprate from the rest of your data/belongings. Possibly in a geocache type location.

  • Both. Wipe the real keys so they can't read it if they do a more invasive look into the device; but present a clean profile to the dumb cop that entered your duress pass, to curb suspicion.

  • I wonder; can those keys be backed up to a seprate device, and reinstated later?

    So: could you use the duress passcode to wipe the keys, making the device unreadable; then later use a backup to restore those keys and regain access?

  • Oh, I misunderstood; I thought this code/sign-off was a commit to tesseract (I've not actually looked at the repo)

    What a child. People don't want to play in his sandbox, so he goes and takes a shit in theirs.

    Good riddance.

  • 'I'm not the problem, everyone else is'. 🤦

    I tried to carve out a space where those people and other rougher edges were not drowning out niche communities and hobbies and where people who choose to use the platform to harass others were also out of sight, out of mind.

    All he had to do was make his own instance, where he can defederate from/block whoever he likes. Let users decide if they want to be a part of it.

    Good intentions don't justify bad actions, and abusing the trust instilled in you as a developer of a popular tool is rarely taken lightly.

    Imposing your own personal opinionated blacklists on other peoples platforms without their knowledge and consent was never going to go well, no matter what your intentions are. ESPECIALLY in the fediverse; a system built to prevent exactly that behaviour.


    The DDOS code however....

    Frankly that should be considered criminal. This dev should be facing jail time for that alone.

  • Interesting to see how this goes.

    • he didn't wipe it, the CBP officer did
    • what evidence? Phones empty.
    • um repeatedly denied a lawyer? Toss the case.
  • I wonder how many people have genuinely tried this; and if any of them actually succeeded. 🤔

  • (well, they try)

    😂

    It's the perfect scam. If you can haul it, half price (cash up front, you'll get 50% back when it's outta here).