DaGeek247 of https://dageek247.com/
Yes. Because it is. https://www.hotcars.com/this-country-is-still-producing-ww2-willys-jeep-parts/
Absolutely not in the states though. Whatever came after passing safety regulations wouldn't be a Willy's Jeep.
Unironically yes.
Yeah. Everyone assuming this is some sort of praise or support of the current presidency really don't know how that phrase is normally used. Half the time I heard that phrase it was in a "wtf is going on right now"/"this shit sucks" sort of way.
Shitty clickbait title is shitty.
It costs money for them to attempt to sort between honest/upfront advertising and the scummy kind.
Honestly? Don't do the whole switch, or even a big switch from a few services to another.
Start small. Very small. Try doing just one service you rely on, like your images or music. Immich just announced their first stable release. I use navidrome for my music. Make sure to test these on a copy of your data, not your actual data.
Once you've got one service working as you want it to do, then you can try your hand at another service. This way, you don't get stuck trying to do everything all at once.
It may be worth considering how much (if any) you want to spend at the start, too. That'll inform your next immediate task; setting up basic backups for your data. A spare drive is a good start, but it may be worth keeping another one at your parents house, or similar.
If you aren't transcoding, and the player is taking too long to cache the video before starting, you might be having some sort of storage issue. You would need to try a couple of different things to figure out what, specifically, is taking so long to send the video out.
The first thing that comes to mind is that your storage is on an SSD, and it is nearly full. An SSD that is nearly full will usually perform much much worse than it would if it had more space to work with. https://pureinfotech.com/why-solid-state-drive-ssd-performance-slows-down/
The next thing that comes to mind is that your files are stored on the same drive that jellyfin transcodes onto, and it is not using an SSD. If you have jellyfin reading from a single drive, jellyfin encoding to that same drive, and also everything else also running, you might be causing your hard drive to seek a lot in order to get everything up and running. You could test this by changing the jellyfin transcode location to a different storage device.
I've also found that page and video loading times tend to be directly affected by the storage medium's seek times. If you had jellyfin installed on the same hard drive as your videos, it will be slower than if you had installed jellyfin on a ssd separate from the drive you store your videos on. This one wouldn't likely result in minute loading times though.
You should not be having transcode issues with anything less than four concurrent streams on that server. https://www.reddit.com/r/PleX/comments/1ae6683/intel_n100_vs_ryzen_7_1700_1st_gen_an_interesting/
It's likely that you have hardware transcoding disabled. Enable it, and these issues should go away. This forum post has good settings in jellyfin for an n100, https://forum.jellyfin.org/t-solved-correct-transcoding-settings-for-the-n100-processor
You should be able to find instructions for enabling hardware encoding in your bios by searching for it with your specific device model.
*edit
Handbrake does a bad job of explaining the difference between software encoding and hardware encoding. Or at least, it felt that way to me when I last used it. You likely were trying to software encode your videos, which, while theoretically makes the end result better quality, definitely won't be quick on an n100. You'll want to pick the option that has intel quicksync/qsv in it in order to get the most speed out of your handbrake encodes. https://www.reddit.com/r/handbrake/comments/z2m814/comment/kxu2a8x/
I wasn't there for it, but this opinion piece has a pretty good story about the whole thing. https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html
Basically, once Google had most of the regular users, and had convinced many of the XMPP users to switch to them, they just cut off support for xmpp, effectively neutering any growth it may have had without their influence.
To compare that to webp, it would be pretty easy for them to fork their webp into a closed source "2.0" and most everyone would be switched over to that version without even having a say in it. Sure, original WebP would still exist, but since nobody uses/supports it, it's basically dead in the water anyways. This sounds awful and unlikely, but it's literally in their playbook, and it is a thing they have done several times. Android, chrome, XMPP, etc..
It's just as likely that Google keeps WebP as open standard for all time as it is that Google remakes it into a closed source tool that only their closed systems can use. The fact that they have a history of being awful is why we need to keep competing standards around, even if they're just not as good or as widely spread around.
Yeah. The companies you mentioned are rare novelties because they chose to advertise very little. That means the thing that is normal is when a company advertises. Ergo, having a good reputation usually requires marketing.
Good insights, and not just software developers, really. We don’t like ads, sensationalism, or anything reeking of bullshit
Its a big list of major assumptions by someone who never bothered to verify if they're even true. He's mad he had to work with a heavily marketed product that his boss liked, and wrote this about it. Check out this quote from the article;
And the really fun part is that “astroturfing” a thread about your product on Hacker News or Reddit is just about impossible. If you go to the places where developers hang out and try to promote your product, you will be shot down faster than Mark Zuckerberg at a privacy conference.
Dude. Reddit is practically more bot than person at this point, and its impossible to know by how much, because of how good they are at fooling everyone. https://www.clrn.org/how-much-of-reddit-is-bots/
The Dollar Shave Club, go pro
I specifically know who these guys are because of their massive youtube advertising campaigns.
Krispy Kreme, tesla
Please. Walk outside. Or watch cable for a bit. Just because you don't personally see them doesn't mean they don't also have budgets for advertising as well. Tesla in particular straight up gave up on the strategy of word of mouth once their product stopped being known as quality, or at least, higher tech than anybody else.
https://teslanorth.com/2024/03/29/tesla-advertising-spend-6-5-million-2023/
https://ingenuitydisplay.com/what-is-krispy-kreme-s-advertising-budget.html
trader joes, costco
Exceptions to the rule, like Stardew valley, which prove the rule. They are famous as not having a marketing budget because not having a marketing budget is weird and unheard of.
You can't really have a "reputation" in this day and age without marketing. The fact that things like Stardew valley exist really only prove the point.
Find a car that fits your needs and then pull the fuse powering the sim card before it leaves the lot. If it breaks, put the fuse back and don't buy it.
My 2019 corolla lost the right speaker and mic access when I did that. I fixed the right speaker by crossing some wires, and the mic hasn't really been needed enough for me to dig deeper to fix it.
Traditional way is to just use a WordPress account, and then move onto a paid hosting service of you decide you like keeping up with your blog. No point in paying for something you don't use. Their ceo was a dick with open source stuff, but the website itself is still solid enough to be used to check if its a hobby you want to actually keep up with.
If you want to spend just as much time managing the blog as you do actually sharing things, a raspberry pi, Hugo, nginx, and a lot of time are also an option.
I personally use Porkbun for the .com and hostinger for the backend, and it's been great for the past couple years to host my own wordpress setup.
But actually, I think that makes me oldschool. The new kids are using neocities.
pcpartpicker has a price alert tool that works amazing when it's not 2020. For my recent purchase I ended up choosing a price that I was willing to pay after looking at the price histories for various cards. Definitely worth checking out.
They also have a price history tool. https://pcpartpicker.com/trends/price/video-card/ looks like the 9070xt hasn't been under 650$ since March. If you didn't mind waiting a month or three to see how the fiscal year change and the holidays affect pricing, you could just set a price alert at 650 and call it a day.
Oof. Top three, but at the same time, half as much as the top paying site does.
Yeah, and on the smaller / earlier side of a theoretical search engine company, google offers their api for free. I think this is actually another one of the biggest contributors to why nobody has tried to make a new search engine with their own index. Why waste hundreds of thousands of dollars in hardware, and even more on personnel costs, when you can just have google do it for you instead?
When I said 'direct expenses' I mostly meant the cost of owning / running a database of internet pages and metadata comprehensive enough to be considered part of a 'fully featured search engine'. There's also the other half; the compute required to create that metadata, as well as obtain it, but at most I would guess that those would be equal in cost to just having the space for a database of all the internet pages (scaling up after that based on how many users you need to support). In short, a scaled down web engine that had access to every page on the internet that people would want to find could cost as low as 100,000$ for a first time purchase for the hardware.
The internet archive does in fact have their own web crawler they use. They also do sites upon request as well; i've had my personal website on there for almost two decades now, specifically at my request.
They also have a full-featured search function available for anyone on their website at archive.org. This is why I say they're a reasonable price comparison for a full-featured search engine. They may spend more on storage and less on metadata compute than a theoretical smaller search engine, but at the end of the day, that's just a re-balancing of the cost, not a completely new and more excessive cost.
I think direct expenses; the cost of owning and maintaining an internet index database, are definitely significant enough that the completely free access that google gives to anyone who wants it, are way more than any single private entity or company is able to support just because they want to have it. I don't think it would be anywhere even close to a billion dollars though.
I think the hardest part of having a internet index database would be the knowledge required to create and maintain it, especially under the hostile forces that are the 75 billion dollar seo industry. If a selfhosted search engine became big enough that the seo industry started trying to break it, I don't think that company would survive for very long at all.
Google is losing that battle, like, almost completely. What hope would a small startup style company have of battling it and staying financially solvent, especially if they're trying to be different from google and bing and actually showing results without the pressure of advertisers breathing down their necks?
I think the hardware side of a search engine is solvable with silicon valley startup level of funding. I think it's impossible for anyone in the current day and age to make that sort of project solvent while keeping the user (instead of the advertiser) as the main customer. For anyone else who can't get those funds, or don't actually want to do a results-oriented search engine, they can just mooch of off google and bing for free.
Size isn't everything, so the real question is: what search site uses only the common crawl index and has results on par with bing or google?
None of them. At least, none that I'm aware of. I just don't think that direct expenses are the reason that there are are only two major web search tools. I also don't think Google and bing are good examples to point at when estimating the cost of running a complete search engine.
If you read all of your article, the author notes that while Google has index of about 400 billion, the internet archives index is actually bigger at around 865 billion.
The internet archive has an operating cost of about 33m/year. I think that is a much more reasonable example to point to and say "running a complete search engine would have a similar price as that".
Also, very neat article btw. I would have never guessed that googles search index count has been shrinking for the past little bit. Or that Google actively culls results from their database that it thinks people won't ever want to see.
The slate truck has been advertising itself as open source; ironically partially funded by Elon, actually.
There's also been a couple people saying they'd make one for the past several years, if my internet searches are a thing to go by.
This guy just started a company for managing an open source truck project, and he seems pretty serious about it. He just started though, so we aren't likely to see anything actually come of it for several years. https://mutiny.fm/ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=G-QgQitWNLY
There's also the tabby evo, which is for sale right now, but I'm not so sure I'd call that a car so much as a gokart that may or may not be street legal. https://www.openmotors.co/product/tabbyevo/