Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
2
Comments
75
Joined
11 mo. ago

  • Every case people cite are civil lawsuits for excessive force. And people usually don't prevail, especially when an officer is actually in the process of being assaulted.

    At most, her family could get a settlement for damages for excessive force. But criminal charges are what would be pretty unprecedented.

  • This is like the Ashli Babbitt case. Half the country thinks she's a domestic terrorist and law enforcement killed her in the act of putting people in danger.

    At most, her family will get a civil settlement. Everyone knows it.

  • What factors forced you to support double prosecution now? Because charges are against someone you don't like?

  • Chauvin wasn't assaulted with what's legally considered a dangerous weapon. So this case would be much harder. Unprecedented, really.

  • So police are never supposed to shoot at cars trying to run them over because the car would keep driving for a bit anyways? Good luck in court with that one...

  • Her car wheels drove directly over the ground where he was. He was literally hit as he got out of the way. He would've been seriously injured if he didn't move.

  • Removed

    you are

    Jump
  • You're truly a lost cause here. Won't be engaging any further with this disengenous argument.

    No, the "all lives matter" comparison seems spot on. No problem is unique to men or women or people of color. Yet some problems are clearly worse for those groups.

    You're acting like I'm saying women are universally believed and supported. In reality, it's just much better for them, even if not perfect.

  • Removed

    you are

    Jump
  • Ironic that you would claim I'm saying "all lives matter" in some way.

    I pointed out something that is much more a problem for men than women, then you lament about how it's also a problem for women. That is textbook "all lives matter" rhetoric.

    Or are you claiming that women DON'T get more support when it comes to SA?

  • Removed

    you are

    Jump
  • You mean the sex trafficker who went to prison for exactly that?

    I wish the guy who assaulted me went to prison for it... or anything, really. Instead, when I reported it, they just took photos of my extensive bruising and lacerations on my neck from strangulation, "lost" the clothes with DNA I gave them, and did nothing to the man. They asked me multiple times if I was gay, as if they didn't believe I wasn't (as if that'd even matter).

    I had to file a federal lawsuit myself since no lawyers care, and men don't have the same organizational or social support. I'm alone in this, currently in the federal court of appeals retrying to reverse a summary judgment.

    "But women have that problem too!" is literally an "All lives matter" take, is it not?

  • Removed

    you are

    Jump
  • Not at all. I just think women have fewer issues, or less severe ones in Western societies. Could be a "grass is greener" situation, but that's just my opinion. I can think of very few reasons to not prefer being a woman.

  • Removed

    you are

    Jump
  • Women have equality and a generally preferable status in Western society. I sure as hell wish I was a woman. My sexual assault would've been taken seriously, police would be less suspicious and hostile toward me, better education opportunities, better financial support.

    Focusing on their issues is comparable to an egalitarian focusing on issues that affect white people. I'm sure everyone here would question that, right?

  • They don't delete reports from record when they're deemed not credible. Not even when they're proven false.

  • Nobody wants him locked up now who didn't want him locked up before this report was released.

  • The report was made a couple months before the 2020 election. Many others also made wild reports. I saw two others in the Epstein files made literally 6 days for the election.

    There are plenty of reasons to make up a story.

    But sure, they should go and investigate it. Starting with the woman and her uncle. Oh wait, I bet the uncle is dead. And I bet she took great effort to gather evidence... right...?

  • This happened before he met Ghislaine and well before all documented abuse victims.

    Nothing seems credible. They waited almost 40 years, right before the 2020 election, to say something. And take no efforts to gather corroborating evidence.

  • The files also contain two other reports about Trump abusing girls, made literally one week before the 2020 election. No corroborating evidence.

  • That's not true. You need credible evidence that something illegal happened. An uncorroborated report almost 40 years after the incident, made just weeks before the 2020 election is not credible or useful for prosecution.

  • China has literally a fascist government. Authoritarians that seize corporate control for nationalistic interests while still deferring to original private property owners.

    Cult of leadership is typical too. Which includes the satisfaction of citizens.

    Makes me laugh when people here laud China. Especially when they're commies who fell for the lie that China is communism.