Skip Navigation

Posts
15
Comments
1701
Joined
3 yr. ago

Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not.

  • It's an image with text and picture, posted to the internet.

  • It would be called something like "Brutal Earth" and would be like a cross between Civilization, Command and Conquer and a first person shooter. Each server has a set number of players that control some part of the globe, starting like 5,000 years ago. Each year is 8 hrs real time, when a battle starts time slows down to real time, in times of peace time flows faster to keep the scale. It takes about a week of real time to birth a generation in game.

    When you enter into a battle with another player's people it turns into a first person shooter for the duration of the entire battle, whether you are online or not. Each player inhabits one of the soldiers in the battle at random and plays through their eyes first person until they die and then their soul is immediately sent into the next live combatant until you have win the battle, concede the battle or have no live combatants.

    The game ends after 7 years or if a player takes over the globe before that.

  • Not if it doesn't happen quickly enough.

  • I agree about the Biden thing. After the terrible debate all the campaign needed to do was invite Trump to a cage match fight. No one would have remembered the debate and we would have an old, but sane president with cancer instead of an old malignant narcissist.

  • Yeah this is the most Ironic platform to post this.

  • You are getting into a lot of philosophical arguments, I am trying to define it in a technical aspect.

    Does free speech absolutistism mean that anyone should be able to post CP on Elon's platform(s) like X or Twitter or whatever we are calling it and guarantee the platform won't remove it?

  • What is a free speech absolutist in practice? I don't really understand the concept, because it seems like forcing your "speech" onto another, which diminishes their "speech"

  • It only costs like a few million, the rest is for embezzlement and fraud.

  • Yeah but if I were buying cheap corn and they said 89% of the ears were good, I would still buy the corn. So is AI airplanes or corn?

  • Well the church gets indoctrination and more chances of future tithes. The parents/students (often) get better educational and college choice outcomes vs the schools in the area. I have noticed the religious schools tend to be in areas where the local district is ranked lower in the state. (Which only hurts those schools more by taking the funding share with those students)

  • I think their point is that they just go into tangentially different workflows and do work you didn't ask them to or need them to do.

  • Yet all the people who lied in Epstein hearings get nothing.

  • Cool so just arrest anyone covering their face without ID and let their bosses come get them whenever they find the time. How can you be sure they are federal agents?

  • I mean that obviously isn't true, that's what this whole article and comment section is about. Democratic candidates standing up to AIPAC.

    Now if you said almost as much, I would give you a pass.

  • I had a professor who did complex math for energy exploration in Saudi Arabia and apparently you can legally buy a still permit if you have the cash to do so. That's how all of the Saudi royalty gets behind prohibition I guess.

  • Sue for what, an accurate retelling of history?

  • By being old? It's the DNC'S fault for dragging him out of retirement so they could be rid of their Bernie Boogieman.

  • Look up the Sasha Reiley stories and you will have your answer.

    (The answer is yes)

  • Speaking of, when they come up for funding Hegseth keeps saying it's for "defense" some edgy congress critter should go "I thought this was funds for the department of war, not defense. We need no new funds for war"