Skip Navigation

Posts
8
Comments
421
Joined
2 yr. ago

Is this thing on?

  • How many of this comment do I need to respond to?

    As many as it takes to get you to understand censorship is a worse means. UM can 'evade' all he wants but he can't take away your unsubscribe and block buttons. Did you know they aren't single use? Amazing!

  • Nah, this whole trend to censor anything and everything that isn't exactly what you want to see is worse for the community.

    I say leave him alone. I don't have him blocked. I don't ever see his content unless I actually do search to see what he's been up to (spoiler: he was a far right nutbag all along the end). Even IF he is spamming articles, that behaviour can be modded by communities he isn't modding for, and those he is modding for can be blocked. Hell if he pisses you off specifically you can block him yourself already! This isn't a community needs to step in issue.

  • TIL. ty

  • My kingdom for ublock filter lines to remove posts with titles including "Trump" or "Musk"

    Edit 2 days later: "Yourinstanceaddress - quotes"##.post-listing:has-text(Trump)

    ie: biglemmowski.win##.post-listing:has-text(Musk)

  • frankly, this magazine is on notice

    Um, what are you talking about?

  • Same story posted from 3 different news agencies x every news and politics community on Lemmy = 🤢

  • ... Balls.

  • ... "and to steal hash browns from your pan if you turn around for 5 seconds" apparently.

  • Imagine sitting in the doctor's office and someone nearby lets out a ripper and the whole office suddenly smells like banana bread.

  • Can they be impeached?

  • What am I missing? Down 2 votes and even 1 more holdout puts it at 216-215 right?

  • Well yeah. Their choice is to either give in to the editor's/owners demand that the language change or they don't have a job anymore. I'm not saying the phenomenon you describe isn't real. Just hold the appropriate people responsible and it is the editors setting the agenda, not the journalists 99% of the time.

  • journalists. Especially mainstream journalists

    Not so much the journalists, but the editors. Journalist can write an article with every scathing detail left in and it won't get published if the editor says 'tone down your language'.

  • ...

    Throw me the rope.

  • The. rest. of. the. trilogy. is. also. widely. panned...

  • Nah, the downvotes from americans tells me the message was clear. This is a you problem.

  • Have I not made it clear? Nothing on american's end. Just keep on upvoting articles filling you with illusions of self-righteousness until that knock on the door finally comes. Fine by me.

    Or... you could "Rage, rage against the dying of the light". I'm not holding my breathe for that one though.