Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
0
Comments
907
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • the future looks bright

    Lol, "don't worry, the people who have all the power will spontaneously give up that power to allow us to regulate them."

  • Yeah, westerners who are ideologically committed to neoliberalism can no longer fully convince themselves that liberalism is The Way, The Light, and The Truth, like they used to, because the counter evidence is on their door step. So now they have to apply the political reasoning they developed watching marvel movies and reading Harry Potter to explain the current situation in terms of evil bad guys threatening the sacred status quo.

  • It's no different than Australia and NZ being part of "The West"

  • It really doesn't

  • You first. Please present your empirical evidence from completely unbiased sources for your claims:

    Because sensationalism creates ad revenue.

    and

    So the news you receive from any side of any story is going to try and make you as angry/scared as possible so you’re more apt to share it and spread the word

    and

    they then use the page bits and time spent on their sites to generate more ad revenue.

    and

    tankie, far-left, liberal, democratic, conservative, republican, and MAGA-affiliated sites. They’re guaranteed to not be honest with you

    and

    stick with independent and unbiased sources like Reuters and Associated Press.

    (Here present empirical evidence from unbiased source for the claim that these networks are independent, for the claim they're unbiased, and for the claim that you should stick with them).

    Go on, practice what you preach, don't just be a bad faith hypocrite who's bigmad that his own personal bias isn't unquestionably accepted as gospel truth.

  • unbiased sources

    Lol. So not Reuters or AP then.

  • Average liberal when presented with facts.

  • Because money can buy newspapers, tv stations, social networks, think tanks, marketing companies, and legislation.

  • Anyone still trying to say AP and Reuters are independent and unbiased after the way they've covered Israel's genocide is just revealing their own extreme ideological bias.

    Also, the whole concept of saying to avoid liberal sources and then pointing to liberal sources while saying that they're "unbiased" (as if bias free sources are even possible) is a peak example of fish not knowing what water is.

  • Because the slow decay of the capitalist order that has been occurring since the neoliberal turn has reached the point where it's effects are being felt in the global North

  • "Those stupid progressives! Why do they not simply have hyperwealthy oligarchs back their movements!"

  • Who upvoted this edgy highschool crap?

  • I hope you understand that you are off the deep end into conspiracy land to the same degree as Qanon types.

  • Western shitlibs try not to blame all their problems on foreigners challenge (impossible)

  • stick with independent and unbiased sources like Reuters and Associated Press.

    Lol

  • I think there are

    Yes, and that's the arrogance that I was talking out; thinking that your completely baseless thoughts are worth sharing.

    someone told me my understanding was wrong

    From what I can tell, your understanding is still wrong, given this "I was a victim of propaganda" talk.

  • The value is that maybe in the future you will think twice before popping off about subjects you literally don't know the first thing about. Just to be clear, thinking that Russia still claims to be communist in 2018 is like thinking Germany still claims to be fascist or France still claims to be a monarchy. There's nothing wrong with being ignorant, so long as you're humble about it.