You can prove your point easily: show us a prompt that gives us a decent amount of code that isn't stupidly simple or sufficiently common that I don't just copy paste the first google result
I tried, it can't get trough four lines without messing up. Unless I give it tasks that are so stupendously simple that I'm faster typing them myself while watching tv
A linter can get quite a bit more in depth than a file-to-file approach. At the very least you can use an ambigious character block list for function names
I have a bit of a radical approach preventing these issues: don't allow unicode unless explicitly indicated or in contexts where it's required or harmless
It sounds fine to me, and I've heard people use it that way. Mostly elderly though. And besides, it's not like this situation is very different from when they/them felt weird to a lot of people
It's different from person to person. The most consistent thing I've found is people trying to fit each other into a cultural box