Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
3
Comments
488
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Isn't that effectively the same? I like the lightweight aspect of it though

  • There's a lot of lemmy instances, which two would you shoot at?

    BitTorrent still relies on trackers, but much like a lemmy instance you can move over and share things elsewhere

  • Then how would you get to the platform? Direct ip?

  • Without names you wouldn't have.. names though? We're still dealing with humans in the end, we like names

  • You can always zoom in and say "see, this little bit is centralized on it's own"

  • I'm on reddthat.com and you're on sh.itjust.works. These individual instances have their own moderation setups. There's no central or overarching system here. We're on two seperate websites. That's the idea, a bit oversimplified.

    But yes, you could go local only, but wouldn't that kind of defeat the point? I want to be able to switch instances, and talk to friends on other ones. That decentralization brings the huge benefit of not having a u/spez situation

  • Let's hope it's not true yet or ever. Did you mean relational? And no, that's not what I said.

    The current dns system works, and has it's flaws. But ens is not an improvement, it's worse.

  • Note: we don't have centralized moderation here either. We're talking in two completely different instances. Just like plebbit would have

  • No, it does not "seem", it explicitly states.

    A hash table is a way of storing data, I suppose you could call it a very primitive database. But that's not the common usage of the word database. Hash tables are used in database indexes, hence why I called it "reinventing the wheel".

    The naming system is still a central part of any network, even if decentralized in design. So it will need some sort or central moderation.

    One issue with ens though, is that the control over it is more centralized than dns. But without regulation, it's worse than the existing solution.

  • A domain name system is for naming domains, not moderation. And just use a database instead of reinventing the wheel.

    That alternative "show if trusted" approach would be nice in an ideal world where everyone already has a perfect filter bubble with only their perfect friends. But unfortunately the world isn't like that.

    You gotta learn to walk before you can run

  • Accurate, what would you do instead of dns though?

  • Except dns requires proper registration, and has a place to report abuse, and those reports are actually acted upon. Moderation here is not preventative, it's reactive.

    Stop trying to justify this approach, a blockchain is cool but you're really just monopolizing domain registration

  • Have you been living under a rock? Just allow me to register plebbbit.eth and make it simple steal user accounts then redirect to the actual website. This, and plenty of other tricks need to dealt with

  • You misread, the unmoderatable free-for-all is about the domain name system alternative. Not the hosted platforms they point to

    Good to see they've got some moderation tools for the platform regardless tho!

  • I think it's the same in most aspects, just less developed. However, it looks like the devs lie about the benefits and use a less secure alternative to dns.

    It's garbage with a funny name

  • Hold up plebs (hah), this alternative to dns (domain name system) called ens is actually more centralized.

    The pros listed here over federation: no central http endpoint, database or dns are a lie. The whole point of having federated instances is that they're not a central thing. Yes, individual instances can be knocked out. It'll be just the same for plebbit except no one can moderate trolls creating scummy or phishing domain names.

    Whomever came up with the idea to charge people gas fees is a billionaire now. Ignoring that bit, this blockchain based domain system looks cool, but an unmoderatable free-for-all is an absolutely terrible idea

  • The block button is your friend

  • I think they're awesome

  • My mom has one of these, but we (my and my brother) don't live with her anymore. We (me and my gf) don't have one.

    You might like a doom box: "didn't organise only moved". Put it in sight but make sure it's small enough that you can put it away when guests are over.