What part of their comment assumes that everyone else is from their country? I only see them referring to themselves and their own country.
If I said "we need public transit as a city" am I assuming that everyone lives in my city or am I simply talking about my own city? I don't see why this is any different and it seems very nitpicky.
My conservative parents literally believe that the tariffs are making it faster and easier to build US manufacturing because of the "money it's raising"...
So then replace the word restaurant with pub then, doesn't change the message.
Ah I see, I guess at least that would help with the main UI, but I'm already using collabora through the collabora code server in next cloud so it sounds like I'll probably have the same document editing experience with OCIS/opencloud. I used to use onlyoffice but after I tried out their mobile app, it started blocking me from editing documents using the next cloud app (which seemed to use the only office web UI) so I was forced to switch unless I started paying for onlyoffice.
What are the apps that you would miss? I basically only use my NC as a Google drive and docs replacement, so all it has to do is store docx files and let me edit them on desktop or mobile without being glitchy and I've really wanted to consider OCIS or similar.
That second requirement for me seems hard because of how complex office suites are, but NC is driving me to my wit's end with how slow and error prone it is, and how glitchy the NC office UI is (like glitches when selecting text or randomly scrolling you to the beginning).
Ah gotcha, I see where the confusion came from then. I wasn't considering the hypothetical scenario where he magically increases water pressure but instead thinking about what will happen in reality when the legislation allows people to get higher flow shower heads (and imagining some of them might be disappointed when it feels less forceful, though I'm sure plenty would enjoy an increased flow if that's their preference). His talk about pressure is a stand in for the actual details of the EO which is actually about low flow fixtures (and I assume low gallon per flush toilets but I didn't read that far).
I admit I was thrown off trying to figure out what we were saying differently, I'm sure I could be more specific though about the hypothetical I was describing. I did a solid semester in multivariate calculus just solving flow equations so it would bring great dishonor to my teacher if I mixed anything up haha.
It depends on how you make the showerhead / flow reducer. You could have one with a pressure reducer which will reduce pressure and flow and results in both less flow and force, but others just use smaller holes for a smaller outlet cross section, which trades flow for velocity. If the increased velocity is focused on the same or smaller area on your skin, then you'll feel an increased spot pressure compared to a lower velocity stream.
That's to say, plenty of low flow shower heads have focused streams, but they're generally too forceful and feel like needles. But there are ones in the middle that trade flow for velocity which makes it feel like the pressure is higher while using less water.
I appreciate the in-depth response but I think you are misunderstanding the point of my comment.
My comment isn't denying that increased pressure at the source can increase flow rate (note I say that you can't increase pressure with a high flow shower head, I am not talking at all about changing the source pressure) - I'm just pointing out that people often conflate flow rate with pressure at the outlet, especially in domestic settings where the flow is intentionally restricted by design (like low-flow shower heads). In this case, pressure is maintained, but the flow rate is reduced by narrowing the outlet, which people mistakenly believe is a loss in pressure, while not realizing that they traded flow for that higher output velocity.
When I say that "flow and pressure are inversely proportional," I thought it was obvious that I was referring to how flow and pressure behave given a fixed source, since this entire conversation is about changing only the fixture. This is more about the relationship in practice when you change the outlet restriction. I'm talking about the "perceived drop in pressure" (what people mistakenly call pressure) when using a low-flow shower head, which is actually a result of lower water volume, not lower pressure per se. I'm definitely NOT talking about supply pressure and flow being inversely proportional, that's obviously not true.
So when Trump or others push for "high flow" heads thinking they'll get "higher pressure," they're misunderstanding how their own plumbing works. High-flow fixtures let more water through, sure, but if your supply system can't support that extra flow (especially with other fixtures in use), then the actual outlet force (again, what people call "pressure") feels weaker, not stronger. That's the irony I was trying to highlight.
Your garden hose analogy is solid, and I think you're mostly in agreement with my original point. You've just interpreted it as a misuse of Bernoulli, when I'm really commenting on how the misunderstanding comes from conflating pressure with flow, especially in domestic scenarios.
To clarify:
Increasing pressure, with no other changes, absolutely changes flow rate
I don't think I have disagreed with this - I mentioned replacing shower heads with higher flow shower heads, but of course that doesn't change the supply pressure, instead the loss in restriction lowers the velocity coming out of the shower head
Bernoulli’s principle that effectively states as flow increases, pressure decreases (and vice versa) when the source is not changed
I believe I stated the same when I said that they are inversely proportional when you are only changing the outlet nozzle
Since the bottleneck is more likely to be the miles of pipes and hundreds of bends, flow rate can’t really be inherently increased but pressure can
Yes, this is what happens when you put a low flow fixture, you trade flow for outlet velocity
The proper application of the principle is at the outlet with a steady source
This is exactly and solely what I am talking about
However, if you try to fill a bucket, you’ll likely find they fill at nearly the same rate
This is about the only thing I disagree on - you can fill up a bucket on the shower setting much faster than you can on mist, this is the entire principle behind low flow fixtures. If adding restriction to an outflow didn't reduce the flow then it would be pointless.
In short I really think we are mostly in agreement, I think you are mistaking my comment as talking about the relationship between flow and source pressure, which is definitely not what I am talking about since changing your shower head obviously doesn't change the characteristics of the water source. If there is something specific I said that doesn't agree with what you said then please point it out, because it really feels like you are just repeating my intended message.
Yeah the actual EO talks about flow rate, which is ironic because using higher flow fixtures decreases the output pressure. Who's doing the real war on water pressure ahaha
I also can't see toilet companies being eager to jump on retooling to make more wasteful toilets since they've already invested in making ones that work just fine with less water. The safe business bet is assuming efficiency will be back in demand at some point in the future, either because of the next president or because of water shortages.
The dumb thing is that the EO is actually about flow rate, but lots of Americans probably don't understand flow rate and believe that water saving shower heads cause lower pressure.
What's really ironic is that flow and pressure are inversely proportional, so using a high flow shower head as Trump prefers actually reduces the pressure (force) with which the water comes out.
I had to try to explain this to a right winger expat in Ecuador who couldn't understand why he couldn't fix his dribbling shower when his wife was washing dishes by just slapping higher flow fixtures into them. I was unsuccessful.
Permanently Deleted
Looks really interesting, I tried to download it off of hugging face though and my access request was denied, so I guess it's not really downloadable today for regular people it seems.
As long as your thermistor or heater block doesn't fall out you should be fine. But if you want to be safe, just set it to 200 and then turn it off before you unscrew it so that it won't thermal runaway if it comes apart while working on it.
In case you haven't realized, the user and pass in the docker compose are for setting the user/pass that you will enter on windows to access the share. It doesn't have to be the same as the Linux server user account - though mine is the same because it's easier to remember.
This very community seems to be the largest by far - around 45k followers if I'm seeing it correctly. It feels a lot more active than the average Lemmy community as well.
Hmm, well it doesn't seem to be any problem with the docker compose then as best as I can tell. I picked a random ext4 flash drive and replicated your setup with the UID and GID set and it seems to work fine:
# /etc/fstab
/dev/sda1 /home/<me>/mount/ext_hdd_01 ext4 defaults 0 2
~/mount % ls -an
total 12
drwxr-xr-x 3 1000 1000 4096 Mar 27 16:22 .
drwx------ 86 1000 1000 4096 Mar 27 16:31 ..
drwxrwxrwx 3 0 0 4096 Mar 27 16:26 ext_hdd_01
~/mount/ext_hdd_01 % ls -an
total 6521728
drwxrwxrwx 3 0 0 4096 Mar 27 16:26 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 1000 1000 4096 Mar 27 16:22 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 1000 1000 6678214224 May 5 2024 PXL_20240504_233345242.mp4
drwxrwxrwx 2 0 0 16384 May 5 2024 lost+found
-rwxr--r-- 1 1000 1000 5 Mar 27 16:27 test.txt
# ~/samba/docker-compose.yml
services:
samba:
image: dockurr/samba
container_name: samba
environment:
NAME: "Data"
USER: "user"
PASS: "pass"
UID: "1000"
GID: "1000"
ports:
- 445:445
volumes:
- /home/<me>/mount:/storage
restart: always
I was able to play the PXL.mp4 video from my desktop and write back the test.txt file
Have you checked the logs with docker logs -f samba to see if there's anything there?
Also you could try to access the HD from within the container, using docker exec -it samba bash and then cd into /storage and see what happens.
I would suggest adding "UID" and "GID" environment variables to the container, and set them to the numeric values for user and group numbers that show in place of your name when you use "ls -an" inside of the "mount" folder (they will probably be the same number).
For example, if inside your mount folder you see:
ls -an
total 12
drwx------ 2 1001 1001 4096 Mar 27 13:54 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 1000 1000 4096 Mar 27 13:51 ..
-rwx------ 1 1001 1001 0 Mar 27 13:54 hello.txt
-rwx------ 1 1001 1001 4 Mar 27 13:54 test.txt
Then set UID: 1001 and GID: 1001
I get the same error as you when I copy your docker-compose and try to access a folder owned by my user. When I add the UID and GID of my user id to the docker-compose (1001 for me), the error goes away.
What did you set UID and GID to and what is the output of "ls -an" when run inside of the shared directory? You can remove the file names for privacy. I just tested the docker container and it seems to work between my Linux laptop and my windows 11 desktop using this docker compose:
services:
samba:
image: dockurr/samba
container_name: samba
environment:
NAME: "Data"
USER: "samba"
PASS: "secret"
UID: "1000"
GID: "1000"
ports:
- 445:445
volumes:
- ./samba:/storage
restart: always
The files in my shared folder are owned by UID/GID 1000/1000 which is why I put those as my UID/GID, and when I logged in from Windows I entered samba and secret as the password and I was able to access and modify the files in the shared folder.
Have you done the steps under "How do I modify the default credentials?" and "How do I modify the permissions?" from the readme?
I think that would be a valid complaint if they had actually lumped everyone in this thread into their statement by assuming that everyone here lives in the US by default, but I sincerely think that any charitable interpretation of their comment reads as "we" simply meaning "the people of my country".