Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
7
Comments
448
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Your experience parallels quite well with the neurodiverse community too, so whilst I do not have the lived experience of your situation, I can empathise with the general feeling of not belonging. I guess this is why Star Trek episodes like this and other franchises (e.g. X-Men) that deal with fictional minorites work so well across so many real-world minorities and "out groups". They also provide a useful talking point to introduce the majority to the perspective of a minority.

    I like to think that fans of shows like Star Trek are typically more aware of the diversity in humanity and more understanding of these differences.

  • I can't quite decide if this is just virtue signalling or not from the Democrats. I know some of them would genuinely support it, but this feels very much like it is too little, too late - if they were actually serious about saving democracy in the US, they could have done this when it actually stood a chance of being useful.

  • The US has had many warnings over the past century of issues with its system of government. Each time they've ignored that and failed to fix the underlying issues. For example, Nixon and Agnew was a warning that the system was ill-equipped to deal with a corrupt president and corrupt vice-president. The opportunity was there at the time to strengthen the system and prevent precisely what Trump has done over the past 8+ years, but nobody did anything about it.

    The founding fathers may be responsible for not envisioning how a gentleman's agreement would be abused, but the greater responsibility lies with those who came afterwards, saw how the system could fail, and did nothing.

  • I don't live in the US, but I did want to just say that as an outsider I appreciate the effort you are putting in, especially given the hostile working environment.

  • Legally, no. Practically/functionally, yes, since nobody's actually going to stop him.

  • Unfortunately, neither Netanyahu or Trump are going to care what Amnesty International says, right or wrong.

    Countries need to be assuming that nothing is beyond the Trump administration and then plan to deal with that.

  • That's a great idea. Glad it worked.

  • Glad she is comfortable with the harness. Did she accept it easily, or did you have to introduce it slowly? One of our cats is quite happy with a harness, whilst the other absolutely freaks out if you try to put it on her.

  • “‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’”

    George Orwell, 1984.

  • Thanks. Just did a quick search and it seems that spelling is more prominent in the US than elsewhere, which is probably why I'm not familiar with it.

  • I feel like they've buried the lead.

    In addition to its directives related to marriage and babies, the Transportation Department’s memo blocks recipients of federal money from implementing “mask mandates,” a reference to requirements that transit agencies followed to limit the spread of infection during the height of COVID-19.

    The memo also requires recipients to comply with federal immigration enforcement in order to receive funding — the latest effort by the administration to target undocumented immigrants, conduct mass arrests and deportations, and deny federal transportation funds to so-called sanctuary cities.

    So (1) no ability for public transport systems to implement measures to stop pandemics (which will be important since avian flu is around the corner) and (2) no federal funding for transport to sanctuary cities (of which Washington D.C. is arguably one).

  • Po-tay-toes. Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew.

  • In a sane world, this lawsuit would be laughed out of court.

  • I think it's one of the easiest ways they can "stick it to the man".

  • Good analogy, actually, since masks both reduce the risk to the wearer and reduce the risk of the wearer spreading whatever they're carrying to those around them.

    Unfortunately raw milk can be a vector for avian flu and if (when) it achieves human-to-human transmission, these people will be vectors.

  • I understand where you're coming from, but then they just become a vector for nasties (e.g. avian flu when it finally overcomes the human-to-human transmission barrier, and you can be sure they won't take adequate precautions to avoid spreading it) as well as risking the health of their children.

  • The big win I see here is the amount of optimisation they achieved by moving from the high-level CUDA to lower-level PTX. This suggests that developing these models going forward can be made a lot more energy-efficient, something I hope can be extended to their execution as well. As it stands currently, "AI" (read: LLMs and image generation models) consumes way too many resources to be sustainable.