I mean, the video is linked above? It's also kind of anticlimactic as he just listens to the guy giving a talk, silently picking his foot, then eating whatever he got from it.
Also... It's nice to be not too judgemental. Seriously, keep that.
No personal investment in the dude, but this reads more like finding an acceptable target to punch on now that a claim he is dangerous has been made.
Bullshit. He ate gunk from his feet on stage. I knew that about him before I knew about his views on sexuality. There's stuff you can't change and you shouldn't ever be judged for (skin colour, scar tissue, that weird smile that shows way too much gum), then there's stuff you might be somewhat responsible for but still shouldn't be judged for because the circumstances might be just so that you can't do much about it (weight, biting nails, that odd tooth that you didn't clean properly when you were 11 and that's now this odd colour) and then there's stuff that's just gross, completely under your control, something you should absolutely be told to not ever fucking do and be ridiculed for if you still just did it anyway (like being live on stage in front of a camera and removing your socks to eat gunk off your feet).
What nonsense. The whole premise here was that people are being told something. If somebody's repeatedly told that they're probably a lunatic because of the .ml attached to their name they'll know something's up. This isn't about not telling people, this is about treating people like they know what they're doing and telling them. Otherwise we wouldn't even have this discussion because I'd just have left.
But this is going nowhere. You say we can't expect people to know the symbolism they surround themselves with, I say it's bullshit. We're going in circles. So, you do you, great. I'll, however, assume that the next person I see wearing a swastika is, in fact, a lunatic moron, and not just a poor fella who unknowingly made a wrong pick in the thrift store.
You can always assume people do stuff knowingly. They usually tell you that they didn't if they didn't. That's the whole idea about doing stuff: You're responsible for your actions.
I'm not punching anyone or calling them names. I'm judging them and tell them that their actions leave a certain impression. And yes, if somebody knowingly buys nestle, I won't value their opinion on sustainable products or supply nets or listen to them when it comes to that topic 🤷. Tough shit. If you wear a badge you might better check what it represents.
You expect Joe Average and Jane Random to not only have to deal with clothing's fragmentation, not only have to figure out which garments can actually be worn and relatively warm, you expect them to also research the politics of each piece of clothing before they wear it in public? And it's not just that you expect Joe Average, and Jane Random to do that, you're so certain they actually do it, that you're perfectly comfortable assuming every single portrait-of-Mao-wearing person has identical political views and stances?
An instance is a choice. Aligning oneself to .ml has meaning and it's perfectly sensible to judge people by the meaningful choices they make and communicate.
Oh, it's not that I don't have DVDs and blu rays. But my tablet doesn't have an optical drive (and I tend to watch some trek doing chores) and it's actually kind of convenient to not have to track the episodes that I already watched.
I always thought the Chinese-made VW are mostly for the Chinese Market?