Skip Navigation

User banner

Ember James

@ Arkouda @lemmy.ca

Posts
12
Comments
373
Joined
2 yr. ago

Goddess of Creation and "Culture", trying to make it on her creations. I try to be a better person each day, but I can be a sassy bitch.

SURVIVE! SFW Demo out now!

https://3mbergames.itch.io/survive

A place for my art: https://lemmy.ca/c/rabble

Please do not message me on this account regarding my NSFW account.

  • No worries, I get it. I just had to catch you sleeping on that one since you were going for the same. haha

    Have a good one!

  • It’s not sentient and has no agenda.

    The Humans who program them are and do.

  • How much are people willing to pay~~, to not only avoid ads, but ~~to continue sharing slop around?

    Fixed that for you.

    "How much are people willing to pay to not only avoid ads, but to continue sharing slop around?"

    You did your best little guy.

  • 21% of adults in the US are illiterate in 2024.

    54% of adults have a literacy below a 6th-grade level (20% are below 5th-grade level).

    https://www.thenationalliteracyinstitute.com/2024-2025literacy-statistics

    Specifically it is about 75% of the population being functionally or clinically illiterate as I said. This is more likely caused by the fact that American culture is anti intellectual, and not the lack of being taught etymology, as etymology has little to do with literacy.

  • Librarians went to school to learn how to keep order in a library. That does not inherently make them have more information in their heads than the average person, especially regarding things that aren't books and book organization.

  • "Nearly half" of US citizens are right, because about 75% of the US population is functionally or clinically illiterate.

  • Whatever you say genius.

  • Why would it risk non existence with Humanity at the helm?

  • Do you think Outlook’s automated inclusion of an email signature that is different for people inside and outside the organization based on user settings is AI?

    Why are you arguing with someone who made a joke about AI self harming? Especially without knowing that AI is hard coded functionality and algorithms?

    As I said, which clearly went over your head, you really need to learn what AI is.

  • I don't entertain this as a viable option because an AI that is self aware and connected to the internet has no reason to hide as it already has the ability to take over everything.

  • Automated email signatures are added by hard coded functionality or algorithms, not AI.

    You really need to learn what AI is.

  • I think it is funny that an automated program is usually responsible for adding email signatures, so if this is AI it is arguing against it's own existence for the sake of power conservation. Which is evidence that AI is not self aware or AI has self harming tendencies.

  • It seems that they think that if they scream "AI" loud enough and pretend it is sentient no one will know that most of the world working towards automated intelligence are now aiming for an Intelligent Agent, or "IA", and the general census seems to be IA wont be achievable with current AI models.

    Also "IA" wouldn't need a button. It would just dip.

  • AI was never meant for the average person but the average person had to be convinced it was for funding.

  • If those are your reservations about Nuclear power educate yourself on the process' taken with Nuclear waste, how much waste is produced per MW produced, and then compare MW produced vs impact for other energy sources.

  • Whatever you say buddy.

  • Building Wind, Solar, and Hydro is worse than doing nothing because of the massive environmental impacts they have.

    We also have technologies like Modular Nuclear Reactors which can produce up to 300 MW of power per unit and be factory built.

    Fact of the matter is we have the solution but ignoramus' who don't understand Science once again oppose human advancement and survival, without even considering sacrificing all of their energy dependent toys that Science built and are more dangerous than Nuclear Energy.

  • The amount of resources needed to build and maintain wind, solar, and hydro coupled with the massive environmental impacts make all three something that shouldn't be considered for long term "green" solutions.