Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
7
Comments
1140
Joined
3 yr. ago

Migrating here (or maybe keeping both) from @ArcaneSlime@lemmy.ml

Will put an eternal curse on your enemies for a Cinemageddon invite.

  • Assume they're not interested and are just being nice of course.

  • Oh well, still not going to talk to people.

  • "No that's not a ramrod it's a cleaning rod, you put a patch of cotton in the slot and run it down the bore."

  • Tbh I'll prob just stick with my tried and true awkward white guy smile-nod. There's people that have been working in shipping for months I've never even spoken to (oddly though they're all guys, the women talk a lot and they're mostly funny.)

  • Be seen but not heard, got it.

  • So to meet women, never talk to them or look at them or even think about them, got it, sounds effective.

  • Well my whole life there was this women's sexual liberation movement that has been screaming about how women DO in fact enjoy sex and ARE in fact horny too. Maybe that explains the common misconception.

  • Goddammit when I try to save this it only saves the first frame. What kinda bullshit witchery

    Edit: Had to open the lemmy comment's link in tor (because for some reason vanadium did it too) but I got it!

  • Honestly, I wish. The car hacking community is almost nonexistent, and doing it voids your warranty. I'm just hoping it picks up as warranties expire due to time/milage.

  • Then reply to the parent, not the comment that says, literally "Now does she 'have proof' of any of that beyond what the pentagon has already admitted? Likely not, but someone probably does have some more info than we know, she just ain't in the club. "

    Only SOME of them like The Pentagon not denying the tic tac video which is the literal thing I said. Jesus fucking christ you absolute muppet.

    Your "incorrect smug dick" routine is annoying, but not much else. 0/10.

  • You literally told me to "stop believing in the sky daddy" in reference to "who knows, the government isn't even denying it anymore, there could be something out there." I literally copied/pasted it in a previous comment because it seemed like you forgot, but now I'm thinking this is just a sad attempt at gaslighting.

    Dude. The thread is all there above, it's not like you can say "nuh uh I never said that" when there's a written record of you having said that, right there, and all you have to do is scroll up.

    You read again. I never once was talking about her specific whatever and I clarified as much, your refusal to accept that isn't my problem (well, aside from it being connected to your continuing to try and be a smug dick about something I never claimed and refuse to go away.)

    I've invented no narratives. YOU did. You're the one who has ascribed meaning to my comments and refuse to accept the truth that I was talking about the phenomenon at large not some specific lady's claims.

  • No dingus, its your abject dismissal of the possibility that there could be something you don't know in the universe, "sky daddy" is just your way to be a snarky douch about it and feel superior and smart for stealing it from a meme (you're not creative, I've seen it before.) You are so upset about the fact that I'm an agnostic about the possibility that there is something to all the countless reports of UAPs over the literal centuries, by all means don't let me shake your faith, but you're not going to shake my lack of one either, and have even less of a chance to do so the more you try to act like a smug dick.

    This would be the perfect time to end this tiresome "you missing the point" contest.

  • No, from life.

  • Please, please, let go of the notion that there is any kind of sky daddy coming to save you. There's no god, no religious figure, no celebrity, no politician, no aliens who care about you or us or want to save us. There's just you wanting to take care of you, and yeah it would be a relief to not have to do that and struggle, but that's not happening. Let go of sky daddy.

    You literally pleaded with me to "give up the sky daddy." Come the fuck on dude. Quit pretending you weren't attempting to be a dick.

  • Tbf, they're kinda not actually denying it anymore since the pentagon released the tic tac video (among others) and actually admitted "yeah this is real and we have no fucking clue what it is." They're just called UAPs now instead of UFOs.

    And the interdimensional theory isn't a fabrication of her mind, it's one of the leading theories, along with "actual aliens" and "us from the future." It's not even the wildest theory thrown around, some think the crafts themselves are alive, and the biological looking things we call aliens are the drones. Of course, all just theories.

    Now does she "have proof" of any of that beyond what the pentagon has already admitted? Likely not, but someone probably does have some more info than we know, she just ain't in the club.

    This is what you replied to. Please point to where I said "she's 100% right and I want to have her babies" or whatever fucking bullshit you think I said. If it's the part where I said "she didn't invent the idea that they're interdimensional" then thanks for playing please try again.

    Kindly huff your own farts somewhere else, will you?

  • And your strawman is that I support some specific lady I've never heard of so I guess we're at a stalemate. Was this fun for you, or?..

  • Alright then:

    Genuinely, WHAT

    I never said what she said was the absolute truth! Read again! I never gave any statement on this specific "spaceship" coming for us that contains "aliens" that MAGA and billionaire fascists are talking about.

    Sorry to "chopped and screwed" your comment, but same same. I never said this bitch was some alien ambassador, I said you can't entirely discount the existence of UAPs anymore like people have been since (well, actually before, but) 1947.

    Go project your political bullshit on someone else, this conversation is about the potential existence of UAPs. And they're NOT the only ones talking about it.

  • Yup, graphene.

    Nope, got a 2007ish 1080p lcd and a roku that's never seen the internet. And one of those tiny CRT guys with the VCR built in, not bragging.

    2002, no sim in mine.

    Nope, purposefully avoid "smart." It's in fact the exact opposite of what it says and is an attack vector, as IoT garbage is never secure.

    Still not 100% free since I use "any website," but doing the best I can and don't need to add "one of the most malevolent players in that game" to own my PC, I'll own it myself thank you.

  • And they still don't want to hear it. They don't want to know they can abandon their shackles and control their own destiny at any time they wish, they're too busy asking the people who shackled them "pretty please" to notice their friends escaping on our own. And evidentially being mad at those who escaped themselves for offering to show them how, according to this post.