There is an article out there somewhere in the ether where someone printed with 100% infill, then put the print in a glass container and packed it with salt that they had pulverized with a coffee grinder into a powder and re-melted / fused it. Their intent was for making clear parts since they were using transparent filament, but it should be great for increasing the adhesion of the layers as well. Ideally, it would become more of a monolithic plastic part than a bunch of layers.
If you are talking about the Core One, here is the connectivity of it from the Prusa website:
"Prusa CORE One is equipped with a LAN port and a detachable Wi-Fi module (Wi-Fi can be set up a with an NFC tap). It integrates seamlessly with both Prusa Connect and Prusa App, so you always have a complete overview of your printer. However, the printer can be operated in a full offline mode without any compromise. You can even flash the firmware from a USB drive."
I love my Prusa printers, but I am not a "fanboy" from the standpoint of shitting on any other printer that is not a Prusa. It's just that I like them and keep buying them.
I think Bambu printers bring a lot of features to users at a really low price compared to any other manufacturer.
Love my Prusa XL. Bought the single head and have been having fun with it. Bought a second head for my Christmas present and have been playing with two color prints.
If you do not have a 3D printer and CAD software, you are 100% right.
If you already have those things like OP, then why not just design / print one? I am also a 3D printer / CAD person, and I love designing replacement parts that are wither too expensive, or often impossible to find. Mostly though, I design and print things that make my and my families lives easier / nicer / more convenient. And they are customized to the exact item and function, something that you would most likely never be able to get in a store or online.
This advertisement for an awful commercial software package with a restrictive license in NO WAY helps the original poster learn FreeCAD.
I am not sure why you consider it an awful commercial software package, but I have found it to be quite nice to use for learning 3D design and improving my CAD skills.
The restrictive license is right out in the open and not hidden, so there is no surprise there. I have been using SolidWorks for 8 or so years, and for designing things for around the house for my use and whatever I put on Thinginverse and Printables it has been a great deal. I don't use it for commercial work, partly because of the license restrictions but also I am not interested in performing CAD work on the side. I do the CAD work I do at home for my enjoyment instead of watching TV.
And as far as not being able to help OP - on more than one occasion, I have had someone tell me that they were using one of the FOSS CAD programs because they didn't know about being able to get Solidworks for that price.
Everyone has their preference, and mine is Solidworks for playing around at home, so I let OP know about it.
SOLIDWORKS MILITARY EDUCATION SERVICES PROGRAM
SOLIDWORKS is a proud supporter of our active military and veterans, and thank them for their service. We
are pleased to offer the SOLIDWORKS Student Edition at a discounted rate to military actively serving in the
US or Canada and/or veterans.
It's $20USD /$40CAD per year. I'm on my 8th year or so.
You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means.