Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A

AmbitiousProcess (they/them)

@ AmbitiousProcess @piefed.social

Posts
0
Comments
275
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Apparently that's the leading theory, but another is just that for reasons I am absolutely unqualified to explain, they sense light in specific ways that causes them to grow differently once they get close enough to another tree blocking some of the light there.

  • Privacy affects a number of things, so it's hard to give any broad answer, but here's a few individual examples I guess.

    • You close the door when you use the bathroom. We are simply uncomfortable with being perceived in a vulnerable situation like that by other people in most circumstances. To get rid of privacy would be to get rid of your bathroom door, and make yourself uncomfortable when you simply don't have to be.
    • You store your passwords and don't share them with anyone. To give up privacy would be to give up all the access to your private accounts.
    • You might not state exactly how much money you have when you're in public. Without privacy, people with a lot to lose would suddenly be easily identifiable targets for bad actors that could kidnap them, extort them for ransom, etc.
    • Online search habits can identify things about you. A lack of privacy means targeted advertisements can convince you to buy things you wouldn't waste your money on otherwise, (cough cough instagram showing teen girls beauty ads specifically when it detected they were feeling insecure), or that governments and corporations can influence your decisions and opinions away from your best interests (cough cough Cambridge Analytica scandal)
    • Being open isn't always beneficial. You might lie to a child about where puppies go when they die, because making that currently private information public to the child would only make the situation harder for them.
    • Harassment relies on identifiable information about you. If you had to publish your name, address, phone number, and email with every account you made because privacy didn't exist, any statement someone dislikes could lead to major problems for you. This means self-censorship, and constantly living in fear if your ideas exist outside someone else's acceptable worldview who happens to also be willing to cause you harm.

    Obviously these are just a few examples, and there are ways in which a lack of privacy can also be beneficial. For example on my harassment point, you could also argue it's bad that neo-nazis have anonymity, because it makes it hard to stop their dangerous rhetoric, but that could again be countered by saying neo-nazis are much more likely to harass and threaten people, who themselves then need privacy.

    It's a similar argument to free speech. It might not be good for everyone in all cases, but limiting free speech (or in this case, not having or limiting privacy) would lead to oppressive ideologies gaining power faster than non-oppressive ones, would dull human expression and make things more monolithic, and generally make any form of democratic or outside-the-norm expression extremely difficult if not impossible, so we accept the potential downsides in favor of the much larger upsides.

  • How recently? Last time I tried was early December of 2024 (version 1.0), though I suppose a lot of the tutorials I was watching were probably made on at least 1 version prior based on their release dates.

    Maybe it's just a skill issue on my part 💀

  • For whatever reason I just could not for the life of me get FreeCAD to work at all.

    No matter what I wanted to do, it felt like it would always behave in a way I didn't expect, do nothing at all, not work like it did in tutorials, or flat out make a change that then became impossible to undo, or take me to a menu that I somehow just couldn't get out of.

    I don't know if it's just me, but I had to literally give up on FreeCAD after spending hours trying and failing to make even the simplest shapes, like a cube with an indent in the middle.

    It's good FreeCAD exists, but it needs a LOT of polish, especially for people who don't already have experience with tools like Fusion, and only have more rudimentary CAD experience with tools like the ones built into slicers, Tinkercad, or Onshape.

  • Yeah it’s like any other music streaming app

    I’m thoroughly confused now

    What I mean is that if I don't have a connection to my home network where all my music is stored, but I want to access it locally on my phone, I am not going to open the Jellyfin app and individually download every single song in my library one-by-one just so I can listen to them on my phone.

    As far as I'm aware, Jellyfin doesn't have an option to simply "sync entire music library" to your phone offline, only download songs one-by-one when you want to download one in particular.

    Are you using the Jellyfin app (or something hooked up to your server) on your phone or nah?

    Jellyfin on my PC, an entirely separate Android app (Retro Music) on my phone because I prefer the UI.

    I use Syncthing to give both my home PC running Jellyfin and my phone with Retro Music the same music library without needing an internet connection between either to work.

    Sorry for the confusion, I think now I'm confused myself 💀

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Unfortunately Anubis wouldn't stop the bots, it would just slow them down.

    Anubis just adds proof of work, AKA computation, to your requests. It's why your browser takes a second before it can access the site. It's nothing for things on your scale, but it's a fuck ton of time and money for large scraping operations accessing millions of links every day.

    For a bot submitting PRs though, it's not gonna be a meaningful hindrance unless the person is specifically running a bot designed to make thousands of PRs every day, which a lot of these aren't.

    Really unfortunate.

  • UPDATE: The article has now linked to the newly published study. It claims a maximum concentration of bisphenols of 351mg/kg, above the 10mg/kg limit proposed by ECHA, but they don't give any concrete numbers on how likely any of those bisphenols are to actually leech from the product into your body. The average sum of all bisphenols/sample was just 15. They note the parts not touching the skin often had more bisphenols than the parts actually touching the skin, with about 50% more of those areas than the non-skin-contacting ones being put in their "green" category, meaning it's fairly in compliance with most protective standards.

    Of the parts touching the skin, 68% were green, 21% yellow, and 11% red.

    And onto flame retardants, 100% of products with HFRs were green, and 84% with OPFRs were green.

    For pthalates, 87% were green, and less than 1% were red.

    Essentially, the TLDR is that most of the things they tested either met most standards, were very close to meeting them, or technically didn't meet standards but mostly just in areas that didn't even come in contact with the skin at all. AKA, it's mostly overblown.

    Original Post:No source linked by the article, no visible press releases that don't just pretend to be a real press release while citing the articles, no official blog posts, and the only official sounding mention of this that comes from a more direct source is a coalition on linkedin saying a person at a sub-group of the broader project was gonna talk with them about it.

    No stats, no numbers, just "they found it" in the headphones.

    You could find a chemical well under the safe limit in drinking water, and say "we found x in your water" and make a big scare of it when it's not a big deal.

    While I have no doubt BPA and its counterparts could be used in manufacturing of headphones, without any actual data, this is literally no better than when your uncle at Thanksgiving starts yapping about how the government found some data one time and that means you should never drink tap water again.

  • The Jellyfin app already supports local downloads.

    Isn't that just on a file-by-file basis though? I just assume most people won't have an easy way to tunnel into their home network if they're out to do streaming, and won't go through the effort of downloading songs one by one, so Syncthing is just a good middle ground to copy all your music between devices and be done with it imo.

  • I hate Meta too, but:

    Unreleased Meta product

    the company says it was never launched, as a result of that testing.

    This isn't as bad as people are making it out to be.

    Sure, it's a problem Meta is releasing technology we know can be damaging and go off the rails, and yes, their chatbots have literally flirted with children before, but this specific instance isn't that bad given they just... didn't launch it after finding out it wasn't working as it should.

  • Gotta keep those engagement numbers up.

  • Jellyfin is just a good media player. Syncthing is a file syncing tool.

    What do you mean by "one or the other"?

  • Jellyfin, then use Syncthing to sync it to any other device you want, whether that's your phone, or another PC/laptop.

    I have that exact system myself, and it works quite well. However, the main downside is that unless you're using a client that can support it somehow, your playlists won't sync, only the music files themselves, so if you make a playlist on your phone's music player, it wouldn't sync to your PC's Jellyfin instance, and vice versa.

  • For anyone who has a Ring camera, wants to get rid of it, but still wants a doorbell camera for security/convenience reasons, I'll point out that Ecobee has a fairly good rating on Mozilla's Privacy Not Included page where they review products for their privacy.

    E2EE transmission of video from the camera to your phone when streaming, on-device processing of video feeds, auto-deletes any cloud footage when people uninstall the app (so non-technical users who think uninstalling an app deletes their data will actually get that benefit), only saves clips when actual motion is detected, first line of their privacy policy is "Your personal information and data belong to you", and their subscription is 100% optional.

    Only real privacy concern is that if you choose to integrate yours with Alexa, it might get some data from that, but that's optional. The main downside is just that they only have a wired option for outdoor setups, but they do have an indoor one that doesn't require any kind of hookup directly into wires in your wall.

    As always though, if you have the technical ability to set something up yourself that runs only on your local network, do it.

  • I don’t think these corporations deliberately aimed their content at any age group.

    Instagram intentionally targeted ads at teenagers specifically when they were identified as feeling low self worth or depressed. https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/09/meta-whistleblower-sarah-wynn-williams-says-company-targeted-ads-at-teens-based-on-their-emotional-state/

    Instagram used this data to more effectively keep teens hooked on the app. For example, they'd show a girl who just deleted a selfie out of embarrassment more photos of attractive women, which she would then likely scroll through, attempting to internally figure out how she could become attractive like them. Coincidentally, the perfect time for Instagram to then serve an ad for a new skin cream, weight loss program, etc.

  • Same.

  • since those are the ones who set strategy.

    Not entirely, actually. That part surprised me when I first went. They couldn't control what I handed out to people for sure, and there were numerous organizations with stand-up tents there that weren't listed as part of the official organizations, and one of them even explicitly mentioned to me that the organizers weren't happy with them being there, but they didn't care and had set up 4 separate booths around the general area of the protest.

    I still believe the pace is catastrophically slow

    That I can 100% agree on. Though it does seem like the pace is picking up more as time goes on.

  • I mean, I've talked to them in person? I've seen them countless times before this, and many of them have been organizing before Trump was president. Not only that, but I've seen the outcomes.

    The local ICE rapid response networks in my community would not have nearly as many members had they not gotten tons of people at the last No Kings protest near me to sign up for their newsletters, the local progressive candidate would have been guaranteed to lose the election without the slim margin added from people at the protest becoming aware of their candidacy, and my reps probably would not have become more vigilant in their anti-ICE sentiment as a primary talking point over just a general wishy washy vibe of not being okay with it had they not seen so many of their constituents turn out.

    My community has a progressive candidate in office who has plans to prevent ICE actions, police misconduct, and also make where I live more affordable, it has thousands more people on standby with whistles and plans to disrupt ICE activity if it happens near them, and it has my representatives voting no on funding ICE, instead of voting yes and saying "but we'll give them QR codes though."

    If that's not a concrete positive outcome, I don't know what is.

  • I get the sentiment sounds better to you than the amount of results you'd get from a No Kings protest on its own, but you cannot honestly believe that your local wine mom is going to wake up one day and literally grab a noose, go out with her friends, build some gallows, and then find a way to kidnap armed ICE officers.

    You would never even get remotely the same turnout if you called for that vs No Kings, because one is something you can do with minimal risk to your personal safety, the other is a guarantee you WILL be shot at, gassed, and almost certainly killed by the authorities.

    Essentially, you're saying that anyone who wants the situation in this country to be better should be willing to almost certainly die on the spot because there's a tiny sliver of a chance they might be able to kill some ICE agents before they do.