thanks! weird that that does it but not blocking JS
AI generated, for reference only
uhhhh
The reader mode text also doesn't seem to match the article text. I think this is on Caixing's side and not Firefox's side though, since "for reference only" (a literal translation of China-specific legal boilerplate) is a common Chinglishism.
Zhou, in a quality-assurance role verifying AI-generated sentences, faced reassignment and a salary cut from 25,000 yuan ($3,655) to 15,000 yuan due to AI impacts; rejecting it led to dismissal.[para. 4]
that's ironic
The Yuhang court ruled that AI cost savings do not qualify as legal termination grounds like business closure or poor performance, nor as an "objective major change" making contracts impossible, deeming the low-pay offer unreasonable and the firing illegal with compensation ordered.[para. 7][para. 8]
The case turned on whether AI job elimination counts as an "objective major change" under Labor Contract Law.[para. 19]
Beijing guidelines define such changes as uncontrollable, unpredictable events like disasters or policies causing ruin, not business decisions.[para. 20]
The AI further provided him with multiple options for content creation to pick from, so he decided to create a hot girl for the “MAGA/conservative niche.” This is because the AI told him that this idea would work. After all, “the conservative audience (especially older men in the US) often has higher disposable income and is more loyal.”
In the following decade [since 2014] of Federighi's leadership, many observers noted a marked decline in the quality[12][13][14][15] of Apple's software products.
when questioned, you have not given a source that john apple is more pro-AI
in fact the article you posted believes he’ll continue tim apple’s path:
"By choosing a hardware leader in John Ternus, Apple may be signaling that it still believes the future of AI will run through tightly integrated devices, not just software," said Timothy Hubbard, assistant professor of management at the University of Notre Dame.
i don’t think locally-run AI is enshittification since unlike e.g. satellite connection, local LLM does not have additional costs of connecting to a remote service
which is very different from “I Can’t Decide”, a music hall track that’s somewhat baroque, even though disco also happens to be upbeat and the vocals are very similar
have you tried "The Big Issue"? it's from the same album and is kinda the same thing, except the vocals are far more female-dominated and the song extends the melancholy a bit
Beeple commented that “in the past, our worldview was shaped by artists” such as Picasso and Warhol. “But increasingly, our view of the world is being shaped by tech billionaires,” he continued. “Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk control very powerful algorithms that shape what we see and what we don’t see.”
they don't have to shape it in a good way to shape our contemporary records
whereas picasso shaped the world in awe and warhol in consumerism, zuckerberg literally does it into consumerism
interesting. I don't think the article is saying "the real doomers are the CEOs", though. what you've written in the second paragraph (and just that is incredibly interesting even if it doesn't have the impact you've outlined. it's incredibly Greek) is fully compatible with agreeing that AI is doomish. I'll also repeat my point that the article advises increased caution more than before of tech's claiming of great AI net benefits.
without further explanation, looking at the mod's modlog posted above makes me inclined to go ask PTB...