Skip Navigation

Posts
107
Comments
1153
Joined
3 yr. ago

[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]Stuped person says stuped things, people boom

I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others' words. Weird, isn't it?

Formerly on kbin.social and thriv.social, now on dbzer0 or piefed.social

  • If it's just an unchanging "no" and strongly in favor of not having the status quo go anywhere, I would indeed say that is "not leading anywhere". Not changing what people think and how things were before is "not leading anywhere".

  • I wonder why that person doesn't just change the browser defaults.

  • And also just Office for now, not the entire OS, though they plan to move away from all MS products long-term.

  • Now, last week, you might have seen that Denmark was ditching Microsoft Office and Linux, but this was falsely reported by the original outlet who did the interview. They said they were going to ditch Linux, but actually the minister never really said that. Everyone, myself included, picked up on the story—reported they were dropping Linux—they're not. They're just dropping Microsoft Office.—The Linux Experiment, Linux & Open Source News for week of 21 June 2025

  • This is said quoted post:

    If you're still buying wizard book shit, you are no friend to the trans community. Here's the wizard book bigot inciting harassment against innocent people to her 14 million followers on the nazi app.

    And no, they can't Always Tell.

    Concrete proposals made for UK public enforcement of washroom trans ban. Lgbtq visitors to UK please be aware and all trans people travel in pairs, avoid any known conflict sites and do not take direct action but withdraw and call police if harassed in washrooms.

    From twitter/X

    https://bsky.app/profile/shelleybwoke.bsky.social/post/3ls7m4vhsy22z

    I get why you would think said post was Rowling's, though . It's quite confusing how the article laid it out and it's easy to miss that the embed logo changed from \mathbb X to Bluesky.

  • could you change the post title to be article headline? i'd hate for this post to be removed for breaking rule 3

  • Trust me, this is way better than getting clickbaited and having slop in your watch history dictate your recommendations.

  • The concept of a desktop assistant has always been there.

  • This post's article is not English either.

  • I think so, if the headline is preserved while machine-translated.

  • That is not the original headline or the in-article analysis, so unfortunately I don't think that's a good fit for this sub/magazine.

  • New version of X.org X11, Xlibre fork gathers support

    Jump
  • huh?

  • New version of X.org X11, Xlibre fork gathers support

    Jump
  • Hyprland and dwl are actual, existing tiling dwms for Wayland.

    i wonder what you thought "dwl" stood for lol

  • New version of X.org X11, Xlibre fork gathers support

    Jump
  • absolutely no tiling dwms have ever been seen for wayland ever

    hyprland? dwl?

  • For me personally I cannot externally observe how obvious my sarcasm is, so I always use it just in case. Plus on many platforms you can spoiler the /s anyways.

    /s

  • oobja

  • No, that's the opposite of what I was saying.

    Then what you said doesn't make any sense. I agree nobody needs to make assumptions. The driver didn't need to, the parents didn't need to. But my argument is they all did.

    His actions were not based on the decisions of other.

    Of course they were. "You exist in the context of all in which you live and what came before you.", said a famous person whom we all know thanks to the context we live in. The basis of whether we do anything is whether it would be good for ourselves, no matter if that means it would be better to someone you're close with or that the backlash from incongruence with society's expectations is too little to worry about. Here, according to your narrative which I agree with, the driver assumed that the views of others and superiors wouldn't change except maybe someone'd bad an eye or avoid looking at them. Instead, parents were scared to have their children ride the bus.

    Didn't you say that the driver probably didn't know the pedophilia connotations of "Lolita"? How is that "Lolita" is a normal word without such connotations not an assumption?

    The story would be very different if parents were primarily concerned about the driver's dress, in which case I would agree with you. But, instead, the story here is with the sign.

    That was not a reasonable assumption. It was an ignorant assumption

    How were they supposed to know "Lolita" referred to the fashion trend?

    He no longer drives that route.

    That's all it says. You assumed it meant he was fired when in fact it could've been a suspension or a transfer to some other route, just as the parents assumed "Lolita" meant what they were taught it meant growing up. The article doesn't even seem to know what gender the driver is.

    This is called the "benefit of the doubt".

    To do that you need possibility for doubt. What is the reasonable doubt against the negative effects I mentioned occurring?

    And this is all predicated on the assumption that the driver was in fact referring to Lolita fashion. If I need to prove there was harm, you also have to prove they was just making a fashion statement.