Tulsi Gabbard’s Fauci Files Don’t Prove What She Says They Prove
Tulsi Gabbard’s Fauci Files Don’t Prove What She Says They Prove
Tulsi Gabbard’s Fauci Files Don’t Prove What She Says They Prove
.jpg?sfvrsn=2f856ee3_5&format=webp)
In her final act as director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard released a collection of declassified documents about COVID-19’s origins and Dr. Anthony Fauci. The headline claim was explosive: “Fauci Funded Wuhan Lab Research That Sparked COVID.” Her press release and accompanying five-minute long video monologue went further, accusing Fauci of manipulating intelligence assessments and lying to Congress.
But the documents don’t show anything of the sort.
The origins of COVID-19 remain uncertain. A lab-associated incident is plausible; so is natural spillover. China’s obstruction has made the truth harder to establish, and scientific opinions vary. There are legitimate questions to ask, in general, about biosafety and U.S.-funded research abroad. But Gabbard isn’t asking those questions. Her press release implies that the debate is over—that the definitive answer is a lab leak—and then uses the assumed conclusion as the foundation for a far more sweeping allegation: that Fauci “sparked COVID” and covered it up.